Bug 1930888 (CVE-2021-26713) - CVE-2021-26713 asterisk: stack-based buffer overflow due to a signedness comparison mismatch
Summary: CVE-2021-26713 asterisk: stack-based buffer overflow due to a signedness comp...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED UPSTREAM
Alias: CVE-2021-26713
Product: Security Response
Classification: Other
Component: vulnerability
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Red Hat Product Security
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On: 1930889
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2021-02-19 17:25 UTC by Guilherme de Almeida Suckevicz
Modified: 2021-02-22 14:38 UTC (History)
5 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2021-02-19 19:01:58 UTC
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Guilherme de Almeida Suckevicz 2021-02-19 17:25:14 UTC
Due to a signedness comparison mismatch, an authenticated WebRTC client could cause a stack overflow and Asterisk crash by sending multiple hold/unhold requests in quick succession.

Reference:
https://downloads.asterisk.org/pub/security/AST-2021-004.html

Comment 1 Guilherme de Almeida Suckevicz 2021-02-19 17:25:30 UTC
Created asterisk tracking bugs for this issue:

Affects: fedora-all [bug 1930889]

Comment 2 Product Security DevOps Team 2021-02-19 19:01:58 UTC
This CVE Bugzilla entry is for community support informational purposes only as it does not affect a package in a commercially supported Red Hat product. Refer to the dependent bugs for status of those individual community products.

Comment 3 Salvatore Bonaccorso 2021-02-21 19:55:00 UTC
Hi

The upstream advisory https://downloads.asterisk.org/pub/security/AST-2021-004.html mentions CVE-2021-26713 as the assigned CVE which is as well inline with https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2021-26713 so I guess CVE-2021-26714 used here is a typo?

If so and this assumption is correct, can you adjust the Alias and the Subject for this bugzilla entry?

Thanks a lot in advance,
Salvatore

Comment 4 Guilherme de Almeida Suckevicz 2021-02-22 13:06:34 UTC
Hi Salvatore, I guess upstream updated the AST-2021-004 advisory with CVE-2021-26713.
Anyway, the bugzilla is updated now!

Thank you!

Comment 5 Salvatore Bonaccorso 2021-02-22 14:38:09 UTC
(In reply to Guilherme de Almeida Suckevicz from comment #4)
> Hi Salvatore, I guess upstream updated the AST-2021-004 advisory with
> CVE-2021-26713.
> Anyway, the bugzilla is updated now!
> 
> Thank you!

Thank you!


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.