Bug 2278266 (CVE-2024-27015) - CVE-2024-27015 kernel: netfilter: flowtable: incorrect pppoe tuple
Summary: CVE-2024-27015 kernel: netfilter: flowtable: incorrect pppoe tuple
Keywords:
Status: NEW
Alias: CVE-2024-27015
Product: Security Response
Classification: Other
Component: vulnerability
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
low
low
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Product Security
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On: 2278267
Blocks: 2278552
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2024-05-01 18:29 UTC by Zack Miele
Modified: 2025-03-20 13:17 UTC (History)
50 users (show)

Fixed In Version: kernel 5.15.157, kernel 6.1.88, kernel 6.6.29, kernel 6.8.8, kernel 6.9-rc5
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHSA-2024:9315 0 None None None 2024-11-12 09:24:55 UTC

Description Zack Miele 2024-05-01 18:29:39 UTC
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

netfilter: flowtable: incorrect pppoe tuple

The Linux kernel CVE team has assigned CVE-2024-27015 to this issue.

Upstream advisory:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-cve-announce/2024050149-CVE-2024-27015-9ce1@gregkh/T

Comment 1 Zack Miele 2024-05-01 18:30:08 UTC
Created kernel tracking bugs for this issue:

Affects: fedora-all [bug 2278267]

Comment 5 Phil Sutter 2024-06-21 16:00:13 UTC
I don't see any relation to security in the CVE fixing commit. The effect is merely for PPPoE packages to not match the flowtable entry when they should and so continue to traverse the standard forwarding path through the kernel. This is bad because flowtables are unusable with PPPoE, but it's more or less just a lack of feature. Can we at least lessen severity/priority values and perhaps also contest the CVE itself?

Comment 6 Alex 2024-06-23 12:21:08 UTC
In reply to comment #5:
> I don't see any relation to security in the CVE fixing commit. The effect is
> merely for PPPoE packages to not match the flowtable entry when they should
> and so continue to traverse the standard forwarding path through the kernel.
> This is bad because flowtables are unusable with PPPoE, but it's more or
> less just a lack of feature. Can we at least lessen severity/priority values
> and perhaps also contest the CVE itself?

Decreased to Low.

Comment 7 errata-xmlrpc 2024-11-12 09:24:52 UTC
This issue has been addressed in the following products:

  Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9

Via RHSA-2024:9315 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:9315


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.