Bug 2422772 (CVE-2025-68261) - CVE-2025-68261 kernel: ext4: add i_data_sem protection in ext4_destroy_inline_data_nolock()
Summary: CVE-2025-68261 kernel: ext4: add i_data_sem protection in ext4_destroy_inline...
Keywords:
Status: NEW
Alias: CVE-2025-68261
Product: Security Response
Classification: Other
Component: vulnerability
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Product Security DevOps Team
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2025-12-16 15:03 UTC by OSIDB Bzimport
Modified: 2025-12-16 21:27 UTC (History)
0 users

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description OSIDB Bzimport 2025-12-16 15:03:54 UTC
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

ext4: add i_data_sem protection in ext4_destroy_inline_data_nolock()

Fix a race between inline data destruction and block mapping.

The function ext4_destroy_inline_data_nolock() changes the inode data
layout by clearing EXT4_INODE_INLINE_DATA and setting EXT4_INODE_EXTENTS.
At the same time, another thread may execute ext4_map_blocks(), which
tests EXT4_INODE_EXTENTS to decide whether to call ext4_ext_map_blocks()
or ext4_ind_map_blocks().

Without i_data_sem protection, ext4_ind_map_blocks() may receive inode
with EXT4_INODE_EXTENTS flag and triggering assert.

kernel BUG at fs/ext4/indirect.c:546!
EXT4-fs (loop2): unmounting filesystem.
invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN NOPTI
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.12.0-1 04/01/2014
RIP: 0010:ext4_ind_map_blocks.cold+0x2b/0x5a fs/ext4/indirect.c:546

Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 ext4_map_blocks+0xb9b/0x16f0 fs/ext4/inode.c:681
 _ext4_get_block+0x242/0x590 fs/ext4/inode.c:822
 ext4_block_write_begin+0x48b/0x12c0 fs/ext4/inode.c:1124
 ext4_write_begin+0x598/0xef0 fs/ext4/inode.c:1255
 ext4_da_write_begin+0x21e/0x9c0 fs/ext4/inode.c:3000
 generic_perform_write+0x259/0x5d0 mm/filemap.c:3846
 ext4_buffered_write_iter+0x15b/0x470 fs/ext4/file.c:285
 ext4_file_write_iter+0x8e0/0x17f0 fs/ext4/file.c:679
 call_write_iter include/linux/fs.h:2271 [inline]
 do_iter_readv_writev+0x212/0x3c0 fs/read_write.c:735
 do_iter_write+0x186/0x710 fs/read_write.c:861
 vfs_iter_write+0x70/0xa0 fs/read_write.c:902
 iter_file_splice_write+0x73b/0xc90 fs/splice.c:685
 do_splice_from fs/splice.c:763 [inline]
 direct_splice_actor+0x10f/0x170 fs/splice.c:950
 splice_direct_to_actor+0x33a/0xa10 fs/splice.c:896
 do_splice_direct+0x1a9/0x280 fs/splice.c:1002
 do_sendfile+0xb13/0x12c0 fs/read_write.c:1255
 __do_sys_sendfile64 fs/read_write.c:1323 [inline]
 __se_sys_sendfile64 fs/read_write.c:1309 [inline]
 __x64_sys_sendfile64+0x1cf/0x210 fs/read_write.c:1309
 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:51 [inline]
 do_syscall_64+0x35/0x80 arch/x86/entry/common.c:81
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6e/0xd8


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.