Bug 2424334 (CVE-2025-68330) - CVE-2025-68330 kernel: iio: accel: bmc150: Fix irq assumption regression
Summary: CVE-2025-68330 kernel: iio: accel: bmc150: Fix irq assumption regression
Keywords:
Status: NEW
Alias: CVE-2025-68330
Product: Security Response
Classification: Other
Component: vulnerability
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Product Security DevOps Team
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2025-12-22 17:01 UTC by OSIDB Bzimport
Modified: 2026-06-29 18:49 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description OSIDB Bzimport 2025-12-22 17:01:47 UTC
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

iio: accel: bmc150: Fix irq assumption regression

The code in bmc150-accel-core.c unconditionally calls
bmc150_accel_set_interrupt() in the iio_buffer_setup_ops,
such as on the runtime PM resume path giving a kernel
splat like this if the device has no interrupts:

Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual
  address 00000001 when read

PC is at bmc150_accel_set_interrupt+0x98/0x194
LR is at __pm_runtime_resume+0x5c/0x64
(...)
Call trace:
bmc150_accel_set_interrupt from bmc150_accel_buffer_postenable+0x40/0x108
bmc150_accel_buffer_postenable from __iio_update_buffers+0xbe0/0xcbc
__iio_update_buffers from enable_store+0x84/0xc8
enable_store from kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x154/0x1b4

This bug seems to have been in the driver since the beginning,
but it only manifests recently, I do not know why.

Store the IRQ number in the state struct, as this is a common
pattern in other drivers, then use this to determine if we have
IRQ support or not.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.