Bug 2550001 (CVE-2026-103658) - CVE-2026-103658 aspell: aspell: Arbitrary code execution via crafted dictionary file
Summary: CVE-2026-103658 aspell: aspell: Arbitrary code execution via crafted dictiona...
Keywords:
Status: NEW
Alias: CVE-2026-103658
Product: Security Response
Classification: Other
Component: vulnerability
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
high
high
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Product Security DevOps Team
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On: 2550233
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2026-10-12 21:31 UTC by OSIDB Bzimport
Modified: 2026-10-29 19:58 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHSA-2026:92458 0 None None None 2026-10-29 16:04:11 UTC
Red Hat Product Errata RHSA-2026:92615 0 None None None 2026-10-29 19:58:58 UTC

Description OSIDB Bzimport 2026-10-12 21:31:35 UTC
GNU Aspell through 0.60.8.2 contains a heap-based buffer overflow write (CWE-122) in its read-only dictionary loader. String::reserve() in common/string.hpp computes its capacity check with a signed int ((int)s + 1), so a requested size of 0x7FFFFFFF wraps negative and the backing buffer is never grown. ReadOnlyDict::load() in modules/speller/default/readonly_ws.cpp passes the unvalidated 32-bit size fields from a .rws dictionary header into this path, so a crafted .rws file with a valid endian marker (12345678) and an oversized length field (e.g. lang_name_size = 0x7FFFFFFF) causes attacker-controlled data to be written out of bounds past an undersized heap allocation. An attacker who induces a victim to load a malicious dictionary — for example via aspell dump master <file> — can corrupt heap memory, resulting in denial of service and potentially code execution. Fixed in 0.60.8.3.

Comment 1 Jon Orris 2026-10-29 16:04:10 UTC
This issue has been addressed in the following products:

  Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9

Via RHSA-2026:92458 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:92458

Comment 2 Jon Orris 2026-10-29 19:58:57 UTC
This issue has been addressed in the following products:

  Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8

Via RHSA-2026:92615 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:92615


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.