Bug 2492748 (CVE-2026-53267) - CVE-2026-53267 kernel: netfilter: nft_ct: bail out on template ct in get eval
Summary: CVE-2026-53267 kernel: netfilter: nft_ct: bail out on template ct in get eval
Keywords:
Status: NEW
Alias: CVE-2026-53267
Product: Security Response
Classification: Other
Component: vulnerability
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
high
high
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Product Security
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2026-06-25 10:03 UTC by OSIDB Bzimport
Modified: 2026-06-25 22:54 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description OSIDB Bzimport 2026-06-25 10:03:40 UTC
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

netfilter: nft_ct: bail out on template ct in get eval

I noticed this issue while looking at a historic syzbot report [1].

A rule like the one below is enough to trigger the bug:

    table ip t {
        chain pre {
            type filter hook prerouting priority raw;
            ct zone set 1
            ct original saddr 1.2.3.4 accept
        }
    }

The first expression attaches a per-cpu template ct via
nft_ct_set_zone_eval() (nf_ct_tmpl_alloc -> kzalloc, tuple is all
zero, nf_ct_l3num(ct) == 0). The next expression then calls
nft_ct_get_eval() on the same skb, treats the template as a real ct
and hits the 16-byte memcpy path. With dreg at NFT_REG32_15 this
overflows past struct nft_regs on the kernel stack; with smaller
dreg values it silently clobbers adjacent registers.

Reject template ct at the eval entry and in nft_ct_get_fast_eval(),
mirroring the check nft_ct_set_eval() already has. Additionally,
bound the address copy in NFT_CT_SRC / NFT_CT_DST by priv->len
instead of by nf_ct_l3num(ct): nf_ct_get_tuple() zeroes the tuple
before pkt_to_tuple() fills in only the protocol-relevant leading
bytes, so the trailing bytes of tuple->{src,dst}.u3.all are
well-defined zero. priv->len is validated at rule load, so the
copy size is now bounded by the destination register rather than
by an untrusted field on the conntrack.

[1]: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=389cf09cb72926114fce90dc85a2c3231dcb647c


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.