Bug 2502215 (CVE-2026-63795) - CVE-2026-63795 kernel: 9p: avoid putting oldfid in p9_client_walk() error path
Summary: CVE-2026-63795 kernel: 9p: avoid putting oldfid in p9_client_walk() error path
Keywords:
Status: NEW
Alias: CVE-2026-63795
Product: Security Response
Classification: Other
Component: vulnerability
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
high
high
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Product Security DevOps Team
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2026-07-19 13:02 UTC by OSIDB Bzimport
Modified: 2026-07-20 14:44 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description OSIDB Bzimport 2026-07-19 13:02:16 UTC
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

9p: avoid putting oldfid in p9_client_walk() error path

When p9_client_walk() is called with clone set to false, fid aliases
oldfid. If the walk subsequently fails after the request has been sent,
the error path jumps to clunk_fid, which currently calls p9_fid_put(fid)
unconditionally.

This drops a reference to oldfid even though ownership of oldfid remains
with the caller. If this is the last reference, oldfid can be clunked and
destroyed while the caller still expects it to be valid. A later use or
put of oldfid can then trigger a use-after-free or refcount underflow.

Fix this by only putting fid in the clunk_fid error path when it does not
alias oldfid, matching the existing guard in the error path below.

This can be triggered when a multi-component walk is split into multiple
p9_client_walk() calls and a later non-cloning walk fails. A reproducer
and refcount warning logs are available on request.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.