Bug 2513211 (CVE-2026-68148) - CVE-2026-68148 kernel: fscrypt: Add missing superblock check in find_or_insert_direct_key()
Summary: CVE-2026-68148 kernel: fscrypt: Add missing superblock check in find_or_inser...
Keywords:
Status: NEW
Alias: CVE-2026-68148
Product: Security Response
Classification: Other
Component: vulnerability
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Product Security
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2026-08-10 12:25 UTC by OSIDB Bzimport
Modified: 2026-08-13 14:19 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description OSIDB Bzimport 2026-08-10 12:25:06 UTC
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

fscrypt: Add missing superblock check in find_or_insert_direct_key()

The legacy 'fscrypt_direct_keys' table caches master keys that are used
by v1 encryption policies that have FSCRYPT_POLICY_FLAG_DIRECT_KEY.
It's just a global table for all filesystems (since the keys can be
provided by the legacy process-subscribed keyrings mechanism, which
makes it difficult to reuse super_block::s_master_keys).

The entries in it ('struct fscrypt_direct_key') do contain a super_block
pointer, though, for passing to fscrypt_destroy_inline_crypt_key() when
the last inode that references the key is evicted.

However, when finding the fscrypt_direct_key for an inode, we weren't
actually comparing the super_block pointer.  As a result, inodes with
different super_blocks could point to the same fscrypt_direct_key.  That
could extend the lifetime of a fscrypt_direct_key beyond the
super_block it points to, causing a use-after-free later.

Fix this by creating distinct fscrypt_direct_key structs for distinct
super_block structs.

Note that this problem doesn't exist in the v2 policy equivalent
("per-mode keys"), since the data structures there are per super_block.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.