Bug 2540446 (CVE-2026-97424) - CVE-2026-97424 kernel: drm/amdgpu/ras: add ras_suspend callback and use it for cp_ecc_error_irq
Summary: CVE-2026-97424 kernel: drm/amdgpu/ras: add ras_suspend callback and use it fo...
Keywords:
Status: NEW
Alias: CVE-2026-97424
Product: Security Response
Classification: Other
Component: vulnerability
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
low
low
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Product Security
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2026-09-24 16:51 UTC by OSIDB Bzimport
Modified: 2026-09-29 11:43 UTC (History)
17 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description OSIDB Bzimport 2026-09-24 16:51:42 UTC
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

drm/amdgpu/ras: add ras_suspend callback and use it for cp_ecc_error_irq

cp_ecc_error_irq is acquired in amdgpu_gfx_ras_late_init() but
released in gfx_v9_0_hw_fini(), so the put site has to query
amdgpu_irq_enabled() because the get is skipped on SR-IOV VF.

ras_late_init / ras_fini have no suspend counterpart, so move the
put to amdgpu_gfx_ras_suspend() / amdgpu_gfx_ras_fini() and add a
matching ras_suspend callback that is invoked from
amdgpu_ras_suspend() before disable_all_features().  The get and
put now sit in the same place and check the same condition (not
VF, funcs registered), no refcount querying needed.

An active flag gates ras_fini so the
suspend-then-unload-without-resume path falls into
amdgpu_ras_block_late_fini_default() instead of double-releasing
what ras_suspend already cleaned up.

Drop the cp_ecc_error_irq put from gfx_v9_0_hw_fini().  gfx_v8_0
manages cp_ecc_error_irq locally and is unaffected; no other GFX
generation has this IRQ.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.