Bug 2540447 (CVE-2026-97480) - CVE-2026-97480 kernel: tty: serial: 8250: protect against NULL uart->port.dev in register
Summary: CVE-2026-97480 kernel: tty: serial: 8250: protect against NULL uart->port.dev...
Keywords:
Status: NEW
Alias: CVE-2026-97480
Product: Security Response
Classification: Other
Component: vulnerability
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
low
low
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Product Security
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2026-09-24 16:51 UTC by OSIDB Bzimport
Modified: 2026-09-29 19:21 UTC (History)
17 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description OSIDB Bzimport 2026-09-24 16:51:44 UTC
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

tty: serial: 8250: protect against NULL uart->port.dev in register

serial8250_register_8250_port() conditionally copies uart->port.dev
from up->port.dev only when up->port.dev is non-NULL:

	if (up->port.dev) {
		uart->port.dev = up->port.dev;
		...
	}

So if both the existing uart slot and up have a NULL ->dev,
uart->port.dev remains NULL. The very next ACPI companion check
then dereferences it unconditionally:

	if (!has_acpi_companion(uart->port.dev)) {

has_acpi_companion() reads dev->fwnode without a NULL guard
(include/linux/acpi.h), so this NULL-derefs the kernel for the
remaining no-dev case rather than just skipping the
mctrl_gpio_init() initialisation as intended.

smatch flags the inconsistency:

  drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_core.c:767
  serial8250_register_8250_port() error: 'uart->port.dev' could be
  null (see line 719)

Guard the call with a NULL check so register continues to work
for callers that legitimately have no parent device (legacy
non-OF/non-ACPI registrations).

No functional change for callers that pass a non-NULL ->dev.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.