Bug 2540397 (CVE-2026-97502) - CVE-2026-97502 kernel: mmc: davinci: avoid NULL deref of host->data in IRQ handler
Summary: CVE-2026-97502 kernel: mmc: davinci: avoid NULL deref of host->data in IRQ ha...
Keywords:
Status: NEW
Alias: CVE-2026-97502
Product: Security Response
Classification: Other
Component: vulnerability
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Product Security
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2026-09-24 16:40 UTC by OSIDB Bzimport
Modified: 2026-09-29 13:08 UTC (History)
17 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description OSIDB Bzimport 2026-09-24 16:40:59 UTC
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

mmc: davinci: avoid NULL deref of host->data in IRQ handler

mmc_davinci_irq() returns early only when both host->cmd and
host->data are NULL:

  if (host->cmd == NULL && host->data == NULL) {
          ...
          return IRQ_NONE;
  }

So we may legitimately reach the rest of the handler with
host->data == NULL (and therefore data == NULL). The DATDNE branch
already guards against this with an explicit "if (data != NULL)"
check, but the subsequent TOUTRD ("read data timeout") and
CRCWR/CRCRD ("data CRC error") branches dereference data
unconditionally:

  if (qstatus & MMCST0_TOUTRD) {
          data->error = -ETIMEDOUT;        <-- NULL deref
          ...
          davinci_abort_data(host, data);
  }

  if (qstatus & (MMCST0_CRCWR | MMCST0_CRCRD)) {
          data->error = -EILSEQ;           <-- NULL deref
          ...
  }

If either bit is set in qstatus while host->data is NULL, the kernel
will crash inside the IRQ handler. smatch flags this:

  drivers/mmc/host/davinci_mmc.c:933 mmc_davinci_irq() error: we
    previously assumed 'data' could be null (see line 914)

Gate both branches on a non-NULL data, matching the existing pattern
used by the DATDNE branch.

No functional change for callers where data is non-NULL, which is
the only case in which these branches did meaningful work before
this change.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.