Bug 2559755 (CVE-2026-98978) - CVE-2026-98978 kernel: namespace: never expire a locked mount
Summary: CVE-2026-98978 kernel: namespace: never expire a locked mount
Keywords:
Status: NEW
Alias: CVE-2026-98978
Product: Security Response
Classification: Other
Component: vulnerability
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Product Security DevOps Team
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2026-10-23 13:30 UTC by OSIDB Bzimport
Modified: 2026-10-27 20:14 UTC (History)
17 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description OSIDB Bzimport 2026-10-23 13:30:58 UTC
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

namespace: never expire a locked mount

Locked mounts are special. They protect the underlying files and
directories from being revealed. do_umount() refuses to unmount locked
mounts but shrink_submounts() doesn't.

A shrinkable mount can become locked once the owner of a user namespace
puts it beneath a locked mount with MOVE_MOUNT_BENEATH. The locked
property now moves to the mount at the bottom making it possible to
unmount the top mount.

So umount() of an unlocked ancestor now expires the bottom mount first
and the covered directory is revealed:

  move_mount(c -> x/hidden, MOVE_MOUNT_BENEATH) = 0
  the cover after the lock moved:  umount2(x/hidden) = 0
  the holder of the lock:          umount2(x/hidden) = EINVAL
  the root of the copy, busy:      umount2(x) = EBUSY
  reads x/hidden/secret: "covered-by-root"

So leave a locked mount alone as it dies together with its parent. A
plain umount() of an unlocked mount with a locked one below it is EBUSY
from now on. It's the same for any other locked child. A lazy umount
still takes the whole tree.

mark_mounts_for_expiry() never sees a locked mount. lock_mnt_tree()
leaves a mount on an expiry list alone and nothing else puts a locked
one on such a list. Add an assert for this.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.