Bug 891244 - (eio) Review Request: eio - Extension of ecore for parallel io operations
Review Request: eio - Extension of ecore for parallel io operations
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review (Show other bugs)
rawhide
All Linux
medium Severity medium
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Wolfgang Ulbrich
Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
Rahul Sundaram
: Reopened
Depends On: 634908 Enlightenment-Tracker
Blocks: emotion elementary 891295 1003692
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2013-01-02 04:46 EST by Rahul Sundaram
Modified: 2013-09-30 13:39 EDT (History)
7 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version: eio-1.7.8-1.fc19
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2013-09-30 13:39:21 EDT
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---
chat-to-me: fedora‑review+
kevin: fedora‑cvs+


Attachments (Terms of Use)
Patch that remove conflicts tag. Moves libeio shared libraries into a separate directory under libdir (2.36 KB, patch)
2013-01-27 07:03 EST, Narasimhan
no flags Details | Diff

  None (edit)
Description Rahul Sundaram 2013-01-02 04:46:22 EST
Spec URL: http://sundaram.fedorapeople.org/packages/eio.spec
SRPM URL: http://sundaram.fedorapeople.org/packages/eio-1.7.4-1.fc18.src.rpm
Description:
Enlightenment Input Output Library
Fedora Account System Username:sundaram
Comment 1 Narasimhan 2013-01-19 02:39:10 EST
@Rahul,
Since eio and libeio are for different purposes, putting a Conflicts:libeio doesn't seem right. I will try to provide a patch based on the suggestion mentioned in https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Conflicts#Library_Name_Conflicts
Comment 2 Narasimhan 2013-01-20 04:14:03 EST
Here is the patch.

http://narasim.fedorapeople.org/package_reviews/eio-remove-conflicts-1.patch

Now we can install libeio and eio side by side. The shared library provided by eio is now installed in {libdir}/eio.

There is one issue with this fix. When I wrote a small program to link to libeio, it linked to the shared library provided by eio. The proper solution IMO would be to patch the dependants of eio with the rpath of libeio.so.1. I am working on finding such a fix.
Comment 3 Narasimhan 2013-01-27 07:03:13 EST
Created attachment 688391 [details]
Patch that remove conflicts tag. Moves libeio shared libraries into a separate directory under libdir
Comment 4 Narasimhan 2013-01-27 07:06:40 EST
@Rahul,
spec file and srpm for your reference

http://narasim.fedorapeople.org/package_reviews/eio.spec
http://narasim.fedorapeople.org/package_reviews/eio-1.7.4-3.fc19.src.rpm

Packages that depend on eio should pass -R %(libdir)/eio to libtool. I have modified emotion accordingly and attached a patch in that review request.
Comment 5 Dan Mashal 2013-06-07 17:17:36 EDT
Spec URL: http://sundaram.fedorapeople.org/packages/eio.spec
SRPM URL: http://sundaram.fedorapeople.org/packages/eio-1.7.4-1.fc18.src.rpm
Description:
Enlightenment Input Output Library
Fedora Account System Username:sundaram

Copying the original spec/rpm for fedora-review purposes. Ignore this comment.
Comment 6 Dan Mashal 2013-06-07 17:21:46 EDT
I would take out the specific version requirements out of the BR's and also the requires field. This is a recipe for trouble.
Comment 7 Dan Mashal 2013-06-07 21:22:15 EDT
Spec URL: http://vicodan.fedorapeople.org/eio.spec
SRPM URL: http://vicodan.fedorapeople.org/eio-1.7.6-1.fc19.src.rpm
Description: Enlightenment Input Output Library


Hi, please continue the review with the above spec and srpm. It is updated to version 1.7.6. 

Successful koji scratch build: 
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=5482554

Dropped some unneeded BR's, moved the man page to the main package.
Comment 8 Dan Mashal 2013-06-14 04:09:19 EDT
No response from reviewer, if someone wants to take over, please do so.
Comment 9 Dan Mashal 2013-08-16 08:40:30 EDT
Spec URL: http://vicodan.fedorapeople.org/eio.spec
SRPM URL: http://vicodan.fedorapeople.org/eio-1.7.7-1.fc20.src.rpm
Description: Enlightenment Input Output Library

[dan@Fedora x86_64]$ rpmlint eio-1.7.7-1.fc20.x86_64.rpm 
eio.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) ecore -> core, encore, score
eio.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) io -> oi, Io, ii
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.
[dan@Fedora x86_64]$ rpmlint eio-devel-1.7.7-1.fc20.x86_64.rpm 
eio-devel.x86_64: W: no-dependency-on eio/eio-libs/libeio
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.
[dan@Fedora x86_64]$ rpmlint ~/rpmbuild/SRPMS/eio-1.7.7-1.fc20.src.rpm 
eio.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) ecore -> core, encore, score
eio.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) io -> oi, Io, ii
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.
[dan@Fedora x86_64]$
Comment 10 Wolfgang Ulbrich 2013-08-16 09:59:41 EDT
Issues:
=======
- Package installs properly.
  Note: Installation errors (see attachment)
  See: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines
- Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage.
  Note: Documentation size is 1331200 bytes in 146 files.
  See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#PackageDocumentation

Creating a docs subpackage isn't needed imo, because docdir size is only 600,8 kB.

Installation errors
-------------------
INFO: mock.py version 1.1.32 starting...
Start: init plugins
INFO: selinux disabled
Finish: init plugins
Start: run
Mock Version: 1.1.32
INFO: Mock Version: 1.1.32
Start: lock buildroot
INFO: installing package(s): /home/rave/891244-eio/results/eio-1.7.7-1.fc20.x86_64.rpm /home/rave/891244-eio/results/eio-devel-1.7.7-1.fc20.x86_64.rpm
ERROR: Command failed: 
 # ['/usr/bin/yum', '--installroot', '/var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/root/', 'install', '/home/rave/891244-eio/results/eio-1.7.7-1.fc20.x86_64.rpm', '/home/rave/891244-eio/results/eio-devel-1.7.7-1.fc20.x86_64.rpm']
Fehler: Paket: eio-devel-1.7.7-1.fc20.x86_64 (/eio-devel-1.7.7-1.fc20.x86_64)
            Benötigt: eio-(x86-64) = 1.7.7-1.fc20
 Sie können versuchen mit --skip-broken das Problem zu umgehen.
 You could try running: rpm -Va --nofiles --nodigest
Comment 11 Dan Mashal 2013-08-16 10:05:15 EDT
In order to get devel to install i had to do some mods. Please check the following spec file/srpm:

Spec URL: http://vicodan.fedorapeople.org/eio.spec
SRPM URL: http://sundaram.fedorapeople.org/eio-1.7.7-2.fc20.src.rpm
Description:
Enlightenment Input Output Library
Comment 12 Dan Mashal 2013-08-16 10:06:32 EDT
P.S. I asked Wolfgang to take over the review.
Comment 13 Dan Mashal 2013-08-16 10:12:42 EDT
The Koji build is finished.

Also the newest spec/srpms are here. Sorry:

Spec URL: http://vicodan.fedorapeople.org/eio2.spec
http://vicodan.fedorapeople.org/eio-1.7.7-2.fc20.src.rpm

Koji:

http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=5821855


RPMLint:

[dan@Fedora SPECS]$ rpmlint eio.spec
eio.spec:45: W: macro-in-comment %{buildroot}
eio.spec:45: W: macro-in-comment %{_docdir}
eio.spec:45: W: macro-in-comment %{name}
eio.spec:46: W: macro-in-comment %{buildroot}
eio.spec:46: W: macro-in-comment %{_docdir}
eio.spec:46: W: macro-in-comment %{name}
eio.spec:48: W: macro-in-comment %{buildroot}
eio.spec:48: W: macro-in-comment %{_mandir}
eio.spec:50: W: macro-in-comment %{buildroot}
eio.spec:50: W: macro-in-comment %{_docdir}
eio.spec:51: W: macro-in-comment %{buildroot}
eio.spec:51: W: macro-in-comment %{_docdir}
eio.spec:63: W: macro-in-comment %{_mandir}
eio.spec:70: W: macro-in-comment %{_datadir}
0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 14 warnings.

[dan@Fedora SPECS]$ rpmlint ../SRPMS/eio-1.7.7-2.fc20.src.rpm 
eio.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) ecore -> core, encore, score
eio.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) io -> oi, Io, ii
eio.src:45: W: macro-in-comment %{buildroot}
eio.src:45: W: macro-in-comment %{_docdir}
eio.src:45: W: macro-in-comment %{name}
eio.src:46: W: macro-in-comment %{buildroot}
eio.src:46: W: macro-in-comment %{_docdir}
eio.src:46: W: macro-in-comment %{name}
eio.src:48: W: macro-in-comment %{buildroot}
eio.src:48: W: macro-in-comment %{_mandir}
eio.src:50: W: macro-in-comment %{buildroot}
eio.src:50: W: macro-in-comment %{_docdir}
eio.src:51: W: macro-in-comment %{buildroot}
eio.src:51: W: macro-in-comment %{_docdir}
eio.src:63: W: macro-in-comment %{_mandir}
eio.src:70: W: macro-in-comment %{_datadir}
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 16 warnings.


[dan@Fedora SPECS]$ rpmlint ../RPMS/x86_64/eio-1.7.7-1.fc20.x86_64.rpm 
eio.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) ecore -> core, encore, score
eio.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) io -> oi, Io, ii
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.

[dan@Fedora SPECS]$ rpmlint ../RPMS/x86_64/eio-devel-1.7.7-1.fc20.x86_64.rpm 
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
[dan@Fedora SPECS]$
Comment 15 Wolfgang Ulbrich 2013-08-16 13:01:29 EDT
MUST:

Issues:
=======
- Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
  %{name}.spec.
  Note: eio2.spec should be eio.spec
  See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Spec_file_name


===== EXTRA items =====

Generic:
[!]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.
     Note: Spec file as given by url is not the same as in SRPM (see attached
     diff).

Diff spec file in url and in SRPM
---------------------------------
--- /home/rave/891244-eio2/srpm/eio2.spec	2013-08-16 18:54:00.282102492 +0200
+++ /home/rave/891244-eio2/srpm-unpacked/eio.spec	2013-08-16 18:54:00.604105770 +0200
@@ -3,5 +3,5 @@
 Release:        2%{?dist}
 Summary:        Extension of ecore for parallel io operations
-License:        LGPLv2+
+License:        LGPLv2+ GPLv2+
 Group:          System Environment/Libraries
 Url:            http://enlightenment.org/
@@ -73,4 +73,5 @@
 * Fri Aug 16 2013 Dan Mashal <dan.mashal@fedoraproject.org> - 1.7.7-2
 - Clean up the spec file some more as devel subpackage was not installing.
+- Update license
 
 * Fri Aug 16 2013 Dan Mashal <dan.mashal@fedoraproject.org> - 1.7.7-1

------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Rpmlint (installed packages)
----------------------------
# rpmlint eio-devel eio
eio.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) ecore -> core, encore, score
eio.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) io -> oi, Io, ii
eio.x86_64: W: invalid-license LGPLv2+ GPLv2+
2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings.
# echo 'rpmlint-done:'

Pls use
License:        LGPLv2+ GPLv2+
Comment 16 Wolfgang Ulbrich 2013-08-16 13:40:34 EDT
SHOULD:

# copy documentation manually
#echo "Copying HTML documentation"
#mkdir -p %{buildroot}%{_docdir}/%{name}
#/bin/cp -vr doc/html %{buildroot}%{_docdir}/%{name}
#echo "Copying MAN pages"
#/bin/cp -vr doc/man/ %{buildroot}%{_mandir}/
# fix permissions
#find %{buildroot}%{_docdir} -type f | xargs chmod 0644
#find %{buildroot}%{_docdir} -type d | xargs chmod 0755
# remove duplicates

#%{_mandir}/man3/*

#%{_datadir}/eio/examples

Pls use '%%' for comments

and sorry for my last comment

PLs use
License:        LGPLv2+ and GPLv2+
Comment 17 Dan Mashal 2013-08-16 21:54:44 EDT
License update.

Please try

Spec URL: http://vicodan.fedorapeople.org/eio2.spec
SRPM URL: http://vicodan.fedorapeople.org/eio-1.7.7-4.fc20.src.rpm

F19 Koji successful build:

http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=5823889

Rawhide: successful build:


both the main package and devel package install

[root@Fedora x86_64]# yum install ./eio-1.7.7-4.fc20.x86_64.rpm 
Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, langpacks, refresh-packagekit
Examining ./eio-1.7.7-4.fc20.x86_64.rpm: eio-1.7.7-4.fc20.x86_64
Marking ./eio-1.7.7-4.fc20.x86_64.rpm to be installed
Resolving Dependencies
--> Running transaction check
---> Package eio.x86_64 0:1.7.7-4.fc20 will be installed
--> Finished Dependency Resolution

Dependencies Resolved

================================================================================
 Package   Arch         Version            Repository                      Size
================================================================================
Installing:
 eio       x86_64       1.7.7-4.fc20       /eio-1.7.7-4.fc20.x86_64       107 k

Transaction Summary
================================================================================
Install  1 Package

Total size: 107 k
Installed size: 107 k
Is this ok [y/d/N]: y
Downloading packages:
Running transaction check
Running transaction test
Transaction test succeeded
Running transaction
  Installing : eio-1.7.7-4.fc20.x86_64                                      1/1 
  Verifying  : eio-1.7.7-4.fc20.x86_64                                      1/1 

Installed:
  eio.x86_64 0:1.7.7-4.fc20                                                     

Complete!


[root@Fedora x86_64]# yum install ./eio-devel-1.7.7-4.fc20.x86_64.rpm 
Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, langpacks, refresh-packagekit
Examining ./eio-devel-1.7.7-4.fc20.x86_64.rpm: eio-devel-1.7.7-4.fc20.x86_64
Marking ./eio-devel-1.7.7-4.fc20.x86_64.rpm to be installed
Resolving Dependencies
--> Running transaction check
---> Package eio-devel.x86_64 0:1.7.7-4.fc20 will be installed
--> Finished Dependency Resolution

Dependencies Resolved

================================================================================
 Package      Arch      Version         Repository                         Size
================================================================================
Installing:
 eio-devel    x86_64    1.7.7-4.fc20    /eio-devel-1.7.7-4.fc20.x86_64     51 k

Transaction Summary
================================================================================
Install  1 Package

Total size: 51 k
Installed size: 51 k
Is this ok [y/d/N]: y
Downloading packages:
Running transaction check
Running transaction test
Transaction test succeeded
Running transaction
  Installing : eio-devel-1.7.7-4.fc20.x86_64                                1/1 
  Verifying  : eio-devel-1.7.7-4.fc20.x86_64                                1/1 

Installed:
  eio-devel.x86_64 0:1.7.7-4.fc20                                               

Complete!
[root@Fedora x86_64]#
Comment 18 Dan Mashal 2013-08-16 21:58:09 EDT
Rawhide build here: 

http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=5823895
Comment 19 Dan Mashal 2013-08-16 22:00:18 EDT
D'oh sorry for the spam.

Spec URL:  http://vicodan.fedorapeople.org/eio.spec
SRPM URL: http://vicodan.fedorapeople.org/eio-1.7.7-4.fc20.src.rpm
Comment 20 Wolfgang Ulbrich 2013-08-17 04:54:18 EDT
APPROVED!

Package Review
==============

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed



===== MUST items =====

C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[x]: ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.
[x]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
     other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
     Guidelines.
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[x]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[-]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package is not known to require ExcludeArch.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
     Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found:
     "LGPL (v2.1 or later)", "GPL (v2 or later)", "Unknown or generated". 3
     files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in
     /home/rave/891244-eio/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: Package consistently uses macro is (instead of hard-coded directory
     names).
[-]: If the package is under multiple licenses, the licensing breakdown must
     be documented in the spec.
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
     Provides are present.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[-]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage.
     Note: Documentation size is 40960 bytes in 4 files.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
     are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
     beginning of %install.
[x]: Each %files section contains %defattr if rpm < 4.4
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present.
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
     in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
     for the package is included in %doc.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't
     work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package do not use a name that already exist
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided
     in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
     %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
     supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).

===== SHOULD items =====

Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file
     from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[x]: Scriptlets must be sane, if used.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
     translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
     architectures.
[-]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
     $RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: Uses parallel make.
[x]: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files are correct.
[x]: SourceX tarball generation or download is documented.
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.
[x]: Spec use %global instead of %define.

===== EXTRA items =====

Generic:
[x]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package is
     arched.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.


Rpmlint
-------
Checking: eio-1.7.7-4.fc20.x86_64.rpm
          eio-devel-1.7.7-4.fc20.x86_64.rpm
eio.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) ecore -> core, encore, score
eio.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) io -> oi, Io, ii
eio.x86_64: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 1.7.7-3 ['1.7.7-4.fc20', '1.7.7-4']
eio-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation
2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings.




Rpmlint (installed packages)
----------------------------
# rpmlint eio-devel eio
eio-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation
eio.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) ecore -> core, encore, score
eio.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) io -> oi, Io, ii
eio.x86_64: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 1.7.7-3 ['1.7.7-4.fc20', '1.7.7-4']
2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings.
# echo 'rpmlint-done:'



Requires
--------
eio-devel (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
    /usr/bin/pkg-config
    eio(x86-64)
    libeio.so.1()(64bit)
    pkgconfig(ecore)
    pkgconfig(eet)
    pkgconfig(eina)

eio (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
    /sbin/ldconfig
    libc.so.6()(64bit)
    libecore.so.1()(64bit)
    libeet.so.1()(64bit)
    libeina.so.1()(64bit)
    libpthread.so.0()(64bit)
    rtld(GNU_HASH)



Provides
--------
eio-devel:
    eio-devel
    eio-devel(x86-64)
    pkgconfig(eio)

eio:
    eio
    eio(x86-64)
    libeio.so.1()(64bit)



Source checksums
----------------
http://download.enlightenment.org/releases/eio-1.7.7.tar.bz2 :
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package     : 04147efce650866b545db1fe15ad43537c318062df42d9c998a0654913211044
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : 04147efce650866b545db1fe15ad43537c318062df42d9c998a0654913211044


Generated by fedora-review 0.4.1 (b2e211f) last change: 2013-04-29
Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64
Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -v -m fedora-rawhide-x86_64 -b 891244
Comment 21 Dan Mashal 2013-08-17 05:10:12 EDT
New Package SCM Request
=======================
Package Name: eio
Short Description: Input Output Library for Englithenment
Owners: vicodan sundaram spot
Branches: f19
Comment 22 Kevin Fenzi 2013-08-18 15:14:59 EDT
Git done (by process-git-requests).
Comment 23 Fedora Update System 2013-08-19 16:33:14 EDT
eio-1.7.8-1.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/eio-1.7.8-1.fc19
Comment 24 Fedora Update System 2013-08-19 22:15:49 EDT
ecore-1.7.8-1.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-14978/ecore-1.7.8-1.fc19
Comment 25 Fedora Update System 2013-08-20 19:59:49 EDT
eio-1.7.8-1.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 testing repository.
Comment 26 Fedora Update System 2013-08-27 19:26:05 EDT
ecore-1.7.8-1.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable repository.
Comment 27 Fedora Update System 2013-08-29 18:21:56 EDT
eio-1.7.8-1.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable repository.
Comment 28 Michael Schwendt 2013-08-31 14:11:12 EDT
eio  from  eio
    provides libeio.so.1()(64bit)
libeio  from  libeio
    provides libeio.so.1()(64bit)
    required by: eio-devel-1.7.8-1.fc20.x86_64
    required by: emotion-1.7.8-8.fc20.x86_64
    required by: libeio-devel-4.18-3.fc20.x86_64
Comment 29 Wolfgang Ulbrich 2013-09-14 15:12:36 EDT
@ Michael
i don't wanna stop your mission and i'm full agree with you that this is a serious issue.
During the review i never was notice about this issue by fedora-review-tool and personal i never installed enlightment on my system (not my DE).
So i'm very sorry about that i don't mentioned this issue in the review.

@ Dan
I suggest that you notice upstream about this issue and we stop all reviews of enlightment until this SERIOUS issue is fixed by upstream.
Comment 30 Dan Mashal 2013-09-30 13:39:21 EDT
The conflict issue is solved.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.