A popular game written in GTK. Your mission in this game is to remove all blocks from the game board. A matching pair of blocks can be removed, if they are 'free', which means the connection between these two blocks does not cross other block and have at most two turns. SPEC: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1338197/1/llk_linux.spec SRPM: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1338197/1/llk_linux-2.3-0.1.beta1.fc12.src.rpm
See http://allmyapps.com/app/ubuntu-9.10/llk-linux-llk_linux for More informations and screenshots.
md5sum of tar inside does not match with upstream tar which is referenced in Source.
Hi Jan， sorry for my late reply. I have updated the tar with right md5sum in the src.rpm. SPEC: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1338197/1/llk_linux.spec SRPM: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1338197/1/llk_linux-2.3-0.1.beta1.fc12.src.rpm
1] Please bump Release each time you perform any change into spec file 2] In spec file you have: Version: 2.3 Release: 0.1.beta1%{?dist} However, version of llk is 2.3beta1 Imho you should have following in spec file (and update Source link to reflect this): Version: 2.3beta1 Release: 1%{?dist} And bump Release each change in spec file (so now it should be: Release: 2%{?dist} next version should have: Release: 3%{?dist} etc...) 3] Are compiler flags honored in Makefile by default? If no, you should honor them correctly http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Compiler_flags 4] if possible, you should use following way how to install desktop file http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#desktop-file-install_usage 5] comments in files section should be removed
Thankkee Jan! I modified my spec files. New spec and SRPMS SPEC: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1338197/1/llk_linux.spec SRPM: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1338197/1/llk_linux-2.3-0.2.beta1.fc12.src.rpm Some changes 1. I bumpd the release from 0.1.beta1%{?dist} to 0.2.beta1%{?dist}. 2. I think the version of llk_linux should retain 2.3 rather than 2.3beta1, beta1 should in the release number. See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines#NonNumericRelease 3. This package successfully honored compiler flags in Makefile by default, so we do not need to set $RPM_OPT_FLAGS/%{optflags} 4. I followed the guideline to intall desktop file, however the desktop file still need some additional modification such as adding a key to the desktop file or changing the content of a key that cannot accomplished by desktop-file-intall. 5. I removed comments in files section.
The package from comment 5 fails to build for me: gcc -pthread -I/usr/include/gtk-2.0 -I/usr/lib64/gtk-2.0/include -I/usr/include/atk-1.0 -I/usr/include/cairo -I/usr/include/gdk-pixbuf-2.0 -I/usr/include/pango-1.0 -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib64/glib-2.0/include -I/usr/include/pixman-1 -I/usr/include/freetype2 -I/usr/include/libpng12 -pthread -Wall -g -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic -o llk_linux main.o llk_about.o llk_algorithm.o llk_inifile.o create_pak.o pak.o eggtrayicon.o tray.o -pthread -lgtk-x11-2.0 -latk-1.0 -lgio-2.0 -lpangoft2-1.0 -lfreetype -lfontconfig -lgdk-x11-2.0 -lpangocairo-1.0 -lgdk_pixbuf-2.0 -lm -lpango-1.0 -lcairo -lgobject-2.0 -lgmodule-2.0 -lpng12 -lgthread-2.0 -lrt -lglib-2.0 -lc -lesd /usr/bin/ld: eggtrayicon.o: undefined reference to symbol 'XFlush' /usr/bin/ld: note: 'XFlush' is defined in DSO /usr/lib64/libX11.so.6 so try adding it to the linker command line /usr/lib64/libX11.so.6: could not read symbols: Invalid operation Failed koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2599474
No buildable package in 18+ months; closing.