Spec URL: http://sailer.fedorapeople.org/mingw32-libsqlite3x.spec SRPM URL: http://sailer.fedorapeople.org/mingw32-libsqlite3x-20071018-5.fc11.src.rpm Description: MinGW Windows C++ wrapper for the sqlite database library. Approved MinGW packaging guidelines are here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/MinGW
Build fails: i686-pc-mingw32-g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOUR\ CE=2 -fexceptions --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -mms-bitfields -O2 -Wall -c sqlite3\ x_command.cpp -DPIC env: i686-pc-mingw32-g++: Permission denied make[1]: *** [sqlite3x_command.lo] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/libsqlite3x-2007.10.18' make: *** [all] Error 2 Probable cause: missing BuildRequires: mingw32-gcc-c++
Update: Spec URL: http://sailer.fedorapeople.org/mingw32-libsqlite3x.spec SRPM URL: http://sailer.fedorapeople.org/mingw32-libsqlite3x-20071018-6.fc11.src.rpm Scratch Build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1322147
Fedora review mingw32-libsqlite3x-20071018-6.fc11.src.rpm 2009-04-28 * OK ! needs attention * rpmlint output Only expected Errors/Warnings from a mingw package * Package is named according to Fedora mingw packaging guidelines * Spec file is named as the package * Package follows the Fedora mingw packaging guidelines * License is MIT, which is Fedora approved * The license is the same as the corresponding native package ! How was it determined that the native's package license should be MIT? * There is no License file in the source tarfile (though some license statements are in the README file which is packaged). * The spec file is written in legible English * Source matches upstream f5015c83030236205aec1494b13ee334 libsqlite3x-2007.10.18.tar.gz f5015c83030236205aec1494b13ee334 SRPM/libsqlite3x-2007.10.18.tar.gz * According to guidelines the version should match the version of the corresponding Fedora package - which it does. * Package builds in mock (Fedora 10) ! The package contains documentation already present in the native Fedora package * BuildRequires look sane ! But is there a reason for having the "BuildArch: noarch" listed in the middle of the list of Thr BuildRequies? * Owns the directories it creates * No duplicate files * %files has %defattr * %clean clears %buildroot * Specfile uses macros consistently * Package does not own other's directories * %install clears %buildroot * Installed filenames are valid UTF8
(In reply to comment #3) Updated: SRPM: http://sailer.fedorapeople.org/mingw32-libsqlite3x-20071018-7.fc11.src.rpm Spec: http://sailer.fedorapeople.org/mingw32-libsqlite3x.spec > ! How was it determined that the native's package license should be MIT? Good you noticed that. It isn't MIT, it is under zlib. There are a few copyright notices as comments in source files, eg. sqlite3x.hpp. I changed the license tag in the above spec file, and I will also change the native package. David Woodhouse (the reviewer of the native package), has also been notified, he is ok with the change. > ! The package contains documentation already present in the native > Fedora package Removed. > ! But is there a reason for having the "BuildArch: noarch" listed in > the middle of the list of Thr BuildRequies? Reordered.
Do you still need BuildRequires: doxygen? Anyway, that you can check post-review. Package approved.
Thank you for the review. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: mingw32-libsqlite3x Short Description: MinGW Windows C++ wrapper for the sqlite database Owners: sailer rjones Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC:
cvs done.
mingw32-libsqlite3x-20071018-7.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mingw32-libsqlite3x-20071018-7.fc11
mingw32-libsqlite3x-20071018-7.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mingw32-libsqlite3x-20071018-7.fc10
mingw32-libsqlite3x-20071018-7.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
mingw32-libsqlite3x-20071018-7.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.