Bug 892808
Summary: | [FEAT] Bring subdirectory mount option with native client | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Community] GlusterFS | Reporter: | rob | |
Component: | fuse | Assignee: | Amar Tumballi <atumball> | |
Status: | CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE | QA Contact: | ||
Severity: | low | Docs Contact: | ||
Priority: | low | |||
Version: | mainline | CC: | bkunal, bugs, chrisw, csaba, dario.vieli, fvzwieten, gpezza2, james, monotek23, ndevos, omasek, pkarampu, radek.antoniuk, rcyriac, rob, rwheeler, vbellur | |
Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | FutureFeature, Reopened | |
Target Release: | --- | |||
Hardware: | x86_64 | |||
OS: | Linux | |||
Whiteboard: | ||||
Fixed In Version: | 3.12.0 | Doc Type: | Enhancement | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | ||
Clone Of: | ||||
: | 1021412 (view as bug list) | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2017-08-31 16:44:47 UTC | Type: | Bug | |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | ||
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | ||
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | ||
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | ||
Embargoed: | ||||
Bug Depends On: | ||||
Bug Blocks: | 1017362, 1021412, 1286783, 1286784, 1501446 |
Description
rob
2013-01-07 21:50:41 UTC
this is known issue as of now, and http://review.gluster.org/10186 has been posted for review. REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/10186 (fuse: support subdirectory mounts) posted (#3) for review on master by Anand Avati (avati) REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/10186 (fuse: support subdirectory mounts) posted (#4) for review on master by Anand Avati (avati) REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/10186 (fuse: support subdirectory mounts) posted (#5) for review on master by Kaleb KEITHLEY (kkeithle) REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/10186 (fuse: support subdirectory mounts) posted (#6) for review on master by Raghavendra G (rgowdapp) because of the large number of bugs filed against mainline version\ is ambiguous and about to be removed as a choice. If you believe this is still a bug, please change the status back to NEW and choose the appropriate, applicable version for it. As we are looking to add this support in 3.8, moving the status of this bugzilla to open. REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/10186 (fuse: support subdirectory mounts) posted (#7) for review on master by Pranith Kumar Karampuri (pkarampu) REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/10186 (fuse: support subdirectory mounts) posted (#8) for review on master by Pranith Kumar Karampuri (pkarampu) REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/10186 (fuse: support subdirectory mounts) posted (#9) for review on master by Pranith Kumar Karampuri (pkarampu) REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/10186 (fuse: support subdirectory mounts) posted (#10) for review on master by Pranith Kumar Karampuri (pkarampu) REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/13404 (mount/fuse: Return correct errno for resolution failures) posted (#1) for review on master by Pranith Kumar Karampuri (pkarampu) REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/13404 (mount/fuse: Return correct errno for resolution failures) posted (#2) for review on master by Pranith Kumar Karampuri (pkarampu) REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/10186 (fuse: support subdirectory mounts) posted (#11) for review on master by Pranith Kumar Karampuri (pkarampu) REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/13659 (protocol/server (mostly): add subdirectory mounting support) posted (#1) for review on master by Jeff Darcy (jdarcy) REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/13659 (protocol/server (mostly): add subdirectory mounting support) posted (#2) for review on master by Jeff Darcy (jdarcy) REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/13659 (protocol/server (mostly): add subdirectory mounting support) posted (#3) for review on master by Jeff Darcy (jdarcy) This bug was accidentally moved from POST to MODIFIED via an error in automation, please see mmccune with any questions This didnt make it for GlusterFS 3.8, moving out of the tracking tree. Pranith : As we targetting this for 3.9 ? What is the current progress ? I don't see activity from long time. Do we have something going on parallely in different bug? hi Bipin, We had two solutions: 1) http://review.gluster.org/10186 but the solution proved to be dead-end. 2) http://review.gluster.org/13659 this solution also proved to be a dead-end because existing locks feature won't work with this approach. Jeff, Shyam, Vijay and I just finalized on an approach we all liked just 2 weeks back, but this is not going to make it for 3.9.0 I will be sending the first cut of the design this week on gluster-devel Pranith Any news on this guys? (In reply to Radek Antoniuk from comment #30) > Any news on this guys? hi, We discussed about this in the last gluster summit. There are two solutions one from Facebook guys and the other from the guys in Redhat. Both of them have different plus points. We need to finalize on the best parts from both of these solutions and implement it. Pranith Wondering if there has been any new developments on this feature, I could really use this in my current environment. Best, Gianni Yes, there is indeed. https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs/issues/175 has more update. Upstream patch https://review.gluster.org/17141 fixes the feature. It is not yet merged. Feel free to check if this work for you. -Amar |