Bug 717564 - Provide native systemd unit file
Summary: Provide native systemd unit file
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: openct
Version: rawhide
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Tomas Mraz
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
: 820138 (view as bug list)
Depends On:
Blocks: SysVtoSystemd
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2011-06-29 09:03 UTC by Jóhann B. Guðmundsson
Modified: 2012-07-27 20:19 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version: openct-0.6.20-5.fc18
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2012-07-27 20:19:32 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)
Native systemd service file for openct (378 bytes, text/plain)
2011-06-29 09:04 UTC, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson 		no flags Details
Minor cleanup to the service (331 bytes, text/plain)
2011-06-30 10:22 UTC, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson 		no flags Details
Show Obsolete (1) View All

Description Jóhann B. Guðmundsson 2011-06-29 09:03:52 UTC 
Description of problem:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/SysVtoSystemd


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
  
Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:
Comment 1 Jóhann B. Guðmundsson 2011-06-29 09:04:44 UTC 
Created attachment 510416 [details]
Native systemd service file for openct
Comment 2 Tomas Mraz 2011-06-30 09:51:19 UTC 
I am afraid that this will not be as trivial - note that the status does a different thing than usual - is it possible to achieve similar thing with systemd unit?
That is to execute arbitrary commands to get status of the service?
Comment 3 Jóhann B. Guðmundsson 2011-06-30 10:21:58 UTC 
Nope not that I'm aware of ( it would have probably been ExecStatus=/$foo if it existed ).
Comment 4 Jóhann B. Guðmundsson 2011-06-30 10:22:58 UTC 
Created attachment 510630 [details]
Minor cleanup to the service
Comment 5 Tomas Mraz 2012-07-27 14:15:31 UTC 
*** Bug 820138 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 6 Tomas Mraz 2012-07-27 20:19:08 UTC 
I finally gave up waiting for the ExecStatus to be implemented and just left the extra status unimplemented.

Thanks for the unit file.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.