Description of problem: running the command vdsClient -s 0 getSessionList returns error message. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): IC153.1 rhevm-3.0.1_0001-3.el6.x86_64 vdsm-4.9-112.1.el6.x86_64 How reproducible: always Steps to Reproduce: 1.setup rhevm with host and storage 2.run the command "vdsClient -s 0 getSessionList " Actual results: gives error message Expected results: should output the following command's output -> iscsiadm -m session -R Additional info: Haim: ------ def getSessionList(self, args): sessions = self.s.getSessionList() for session in sessions['sessions']: print session return 0, '' added a print for session and its an empty dict, args is 0 as well and not required by optparse ------------------------- vdsClient -s 0 getSessionList and got error, I got the same on 10.35.70.13 Please advise, Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/share/vdsm/vdsClient.py", line 1987, in <module> code, message = commands[command][0](commandArgs) File "/usr/share/vdsm/vdsClient.py", line 558, in getSessionList sessions = self.s.getSessionList() File "/usr/lib64/python2.6/xmlrpclib.py", line 1199, in __call__ return self.__send(self.__name, args) File "/usr/lib64/python2.6/xmlrpclib.py", line 1489, in __request verbose=self.__verbose File "/usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/M2Crypto/m2xmlrpclib.py", line 64, in request return self.parse_response(h.getfile()) File "/usr/lib64/python2.6/xmlrpclib.py", line 1361, in parse_response return self._parse_response(file, None) File "/usr/lib64/python2.6/xmlrpclib.py", line 1392, in _parse_response return u.close() File "/usr/lib64/python2.6/xmlrpclib.py", line 838, in close raise Fault(**self._stack[0]) Fault: <Fault 1: '<type \'exceptions.Exception\'>:method "getSessionList" is not supported'>
http://gerrit.ovirt.org/#change,659
Hi Dan, I checked with Haim and this bug is only fixed Upstream, What about Downstream ? David,
(In reply to comment #2) > Hi Dan, > > I checked with Haim and this bug is only fixed Upstream, > What about Downstream ? > David, The bug is not important enough to backport into rhev-3.0.z (vdsClient is not supported at all). Wait for rhev-3.1 and you'll have it downstream.
So Should I close this bug / re-assign or else ?
(In reply to comment #4) > So Should I close this bug / re-assign or else ? Dan is right (as always) however, this bug should move to assigned till backport is done.
Haim, no. This is an oVirt bug. It is now solved in oVirt. If it was a RHEV bug, it should have been backported. But it is won't ever be bacported, as it is not important enough. Check it upstream, verify it there, and close it. If you REALLY want, you can move the bug to RHEL-6.3, check it there, verify and close it. In any case, it does not worth our worries.
(In reply to comment #6) > Haim, no. This is an oVirt bug. It is now solved in oVirt. > > If it was a RHEV bug, it should have been backported. But it is won't ever be > bacported, as it is not important enough. > > Check it upstream, verify it there, and close it. > > If you REALLY want, you can move the bug to RHEL-6.3, check it there, verify > and close it. > > In any case, it does not worth our worries. sorry !!! i thought that the bug was opened on RHEL, my bad.