+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #1625074 +++ This is an automatically created tracking bug! It was created to ensure that one or more security vulnerabilities are fixed in affected versions of fedora-all. For comments that are specific to the vulnerability please use bugs filed against the "Security Response" product referenced in the "Blocks" field. For more information see: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Security/TrackingBugs When submitting as an update, use the fedpkg template provided in the next comment(s). This will include the bug IDs of this tracking bug as well as the relevant top-level CVE bugs. Please also mention the CVE IDs being fixed in the RPM changelog and the fedpkg commit message. NOTE: this issue affects multiple supported versions of Fedora. While only one tracking bug has been filed, please correct all affected versions at the same time. If you need to fix the versions independent of each other, you may clone this bug as appropriate. --- Additional comment from Siddharth Sharma on 2018-09-04 01:42:14 EDT --- Use the following template to for the 'fedpkg update' request to submit an update for this issue as it contains the top-level parent bug(s) as well as this tracking bug. This will ensure that all associated bugs get updated when new packages are pushed to stable. ===== # bugfix, security, enhancement, newpackage (required) type=security # testing, stable request=testing # Bug numbers: 1234,9876 bugs=1607618,1625074 # Description of your update notes=Security fix for [PUT CVEs HERE] # Enable request automation based on the stable/unstable karma thresholds autokarma=True stable_karma=3 unstable_karma=-3 # Automatically close bugs when this marked as stable close_bugs=True # Suggest that users restart after update suggest_reboot=False ====== Additionally, you may opt to use the bodhi web interface to submit updates: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/new
REVIEW: https://review.gluster.org/21071 (posix: remove not supported get/set content) posted (#1) for review on master by Amar Tumballi
COMMIT: https://review.gluster.org/21071 committed in master by "Krutika Dhananjay" <kdhananj> with a commit message- posix: remove not supported get/set content getting and setting a file's content using extended attribute worked great as a GET/PUT alternative when an object storage is supported on top of Gluster. But it needs application changes, and also, it skips some caching layers. It is not used over years, and not supported any more. Remove the dead code. Fixes: bz#1625102 Change-Id: Ide3b3f1f644f6ca58558bbe45561f346f96b95b7 Signed-off-by: Amar Tumballi <amarts>
REVIEW: https://review.gluster.org/21075 (posix: remove not supported get/set content) posted (#1) for review on release-4.1 by Amar Tumballi
COMMIT: https://review.gluster.org/21075 committed in release-4.1 by "jiffin tony Thottan" <jthottan> with a commit message- posix: remove not supported get/set content getting and setting a file's content using extended attribute worked great as a GET/PUT alternative when an object storage is supported on top of Gluster. But it needs application changes, and also, it skips some caching layers. It is not used over years, and not supported any more. Removing the dead code. Fixes: bz#1625102 Change-Id: Ide3b3f1f644f6ca58558bbe45561f346f96b95b7 Signed-off-by: Amar Tumballi <amarts>
This bug is getting closed because a release has been made available that should address the reported issue. In case the problem is still not fixed with glusterfs-4.1.4, please open a new bug report. glusterfs-4.1.4 has been announced on the Gluster mailinglists [1], packages for several distributions should become available in the near future. Keep an eye on the Gluster Users mailinglist [2] and the update infrastructure for your distribution. [1] https://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/announce/2018-September/000112.html [2] https://www.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/
This bug is getting closed because a release has been made available that should address the reported issue. In case the problem is still not fixed with glusterfs-5.0, please open a new bug report. glusterfs-5.0 has been announced on the Gluster mailinglists [1], packages for several distributions should become available in the near future. Keep an eye on the Gluster Users mailinglist [2] and the update infrastructure for your distribution. [1] https://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/announce/2018-October/000115.html [2] https://www.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/