Bug 1000467

Summary: mesa: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 Reporter: Tomas Pelka <tpelka>
Component: mesaAssignee: Dave Airlie <airlied>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Desktop QE <desktop-qa-list>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 6.5   
Target Milestone: rc   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2013-11-21 06:23:28 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Attachments:
Description Flags
vbios.rom from dri/0/ none

Description Tomas Pelka 2013-08-23 13:45:15 UTC 
Description of problem:
:error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
   /usr/lib/libXvMCr300.so
   /usr/lib/libXvMCr300.so.1
   /usr/lib/libXvMCr300.so.1.0.0
   /usr/lib/libXvMCr600.so
   /usr/lib/libXvMCr600.so.1


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
mesa-9.2-0.4.el6

How reproducible:
100%

Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.

Actual results:
unpackaged files exist

Expected results:
there should be no unpackaged files

Additional info:
Comment 1 Tomas Pelka 2013-09-10 07:15:41 UTC 
Created attachment 795866 [details]
vbios.rom from dri/0/
Comment 2 Tomas Pelka 2013-09-10 07:19:33 UTC 
Wrong bug, please my last commments.
Comment 3 Dave Airlie 2013-09-11 22:44:14 UTC 
begrudging ack, this is a pointless test and a waste of developer resources at this time,
Comment 4 Dave Airlie 2013-09-12 02:16:23 UTC 
fixed in brew
Comment 8 errata-xmlrpc 2013-11-21 06:23:28 UTC 
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2013-1559.html