Bug 1000862

Summary:	Review Request: emacs-mallard-mode - Emacs major mode for editing Mallard pages
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Jaromir Hradilek <jhradilek>
Component:	Package Review	Assignee:	Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody>
Status:	CLOSED NOTABUG	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	medium
Version:	rawhide	CC:	echevemaster, i, otto.liljalaakso, package-review
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2021-07-08 00:45:33 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Bug Depends On:
Bug Blocks:	201449

Description Jaromir Hradilek 2013-08-26 01:47:20 UTC

Spec URL: http://jhradile.fedorapeople.org/packages/emacs-mallard-mode/emacs-mallard-mode.spec
SRPM URL: http://jhradile.fedorapeople.org/packages/emacs-mallard-mode/emacs-mallard-mode-0.3.0-1.fc19.src.rpm
Description: The emacs-mallard-mode package provides Mallard mode, a major mode for editing Mallard pages in GNU Emacs. When enabled, this mode automatically loads the RELAX NG schema for the Mallard language, sets appropriate indentation rules, and enables automatic line wrapping. In addition, it provides a number of commands and key bindings that integrate it with the yelp-check utility in order to provide maximum comfort when working on Mallard files.
Fedora Account System Username: jhradile
Successfull Koji Build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=5852508

Mallard is an XML-based markup language for topic-based documentation that is extensively used by the GNOME Project. This is my very first attempt to crate a Fedora package, so any advice is most welcome. Also, if there is anything I can do as the upstream maintainer to make it easier to package this piece of software for Fedora, please, let me know and I will do my best. Note that the spec file is based on a sample file that was kindly sent to me by Paul W. Frields.

I am currently in need of a sponsor. In the future, I would also like to take over the maintenance of blazeblogger, another creation of mine which no longer seems to be maintained in Fedora 19: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=9006

Comment 1 Christopher Meng 2013-08-26 01:50:58 UTC

- If there is no such

%clean

%post

%preun

sections, just remove them.

- Use install instead of %{__install}

- You can use %setup -q in %prep, default---> %setup -q -n %{name}-%{version}

Comment 2 Jaromir Hradilek 2013-08-26 02:12:01 UTC

Thank you very much, Christopher. I have updated both the spec file and the SRPM package according to your advice.

Comment 3 Eduardo Echeverria 2014-08-09 08:39:59 UTC

Hi jaromir, some comments to your spec:

- Manage the sourc urle following this guideline http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:SourceURL#Github

- According to the emacs guidelines since Fedora 16 the elisp files  not should be splitted in subpackages

See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Emacs

Comment 4 Package Review 2021-04-24 00:45:18 UTC

This is an automatic check from review-stats script.

This review request ticket hasn't been updated for some time, but it seems
that the review is still being working out by you. If this is right, please
respond to this comment clearing the NEEDINFO flag and try to reach out the
submitter to proceed with the review.

If you're not interested in reviewing this ticket anymore, please clear the
fedora-review flag and reset the assignee, so that a new reviewer can take
this ticket.

Without any reply, this request will shortly be resetted.

Comment 5 Package Review 2021-06-04 00:45:40 UTC

This is an automatic action taken by review-stats script.

The ticket reviewer failed to clear the NEEDINFO flag in a month.
As per https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_stalled_package_reviews
we reset the status and the assignee of this ticket.

Comment 6 Otto Liljalaakso 2021-06-07 21:41:03 UTC

This review request is very old. Do you still indend to complete it? If so, I can review. If not, please close the issue.

Comment 7 Package Review 2021-07-08 00:45:33 UTC

This is an automatic action taken by review-stats script.

The ticket submitter failed to clear the NEEDINFO flag in a month.
As per https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_stalled_package_reviews
we consider this ticket as DEADREVIEW and proceed to close it.