Bug 1005459

Summary: Rename Review: wmdocker - KDE and GNOME2 system tray replacement docking application
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Andreas Bierfert <andreas.bierfert>
Component: Package ReviewAssignee: Matthew Miller <mattdm>
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: rawhideCC: jeder, mattdm, notting
Target Milestone: ---Flags: mattdm: fedora-review+
gwync: fedora-cvs+
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2013-11-18 17:14:05 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:

Description Andreas Bierfert 2013-09-07 08:07:06 UTC
Spec URL: http://fedora.lowlatency.de/review/wmdocker.spec 
SRPM URL: http://fedora.lowlatency.de/review/wmdocker-1.5-11.fc19.src.rpm
Koji: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=5907199

Description:
Docker is a docking application (WindowMaker dock app) which acts as a system
tray for KDE and GNOME2. It can be used to replace the panel in either
environment, allowing you to have a system tray without running the KDE/GNOME
panel or environment.

Fedora Account System Username: awjb

See https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/341.

Comment 1 Matthew Miller 2013-09-09 18:21:22 UTC
Note as per https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/341#comment:7, it is okay to omit  "Provides: docker" (and this spec file does). Obsoletes is also properly provided, with a conditional for < f22. (That can, of course, be dropped in the future, but the conditional seems like a good idea too.)

Comment 2 Matthew Miller 2013-09-09 18:31:08 UTC
A few small things on review:

- the license should actually be "GPLv2+", not "GPL".
- you can drop the %defattr if you like
- same with Buildroot
- and with %clean section


And a bigger question: do we want to rename the binary to wmdocker?

Comment 3 Andreas Bierfert 2013-09-10 20:36:34 UTC
Thanks for taking up the review.

I will change the stuff you pointed out asap.

I thought about the rename myself but came to the conclusion that if we provide a clean upgrade path users will probably have a smooth transition package wise but will be missing their docker dockapp... if they pinpoint it to the rename it is not a problem however. Will the new docker package provide a docker binary?

Comment 4 Matthew Miller 2013-09-10 20:42:24 UTC
Yes, it has a docker binary, and that's much harder to change than the package name, since a lot of external documentation will talk about it (and the upstream is very concerned about a pleasant/seamless/same-everywhere user experience).

Comment 5 Andreas Bierfert 2013-09-10 20:56:26 UTC
Ok, before we add a conflicts I will rename the binary as well.

Comment 7 Matthew Miller 2013-09-21 19:15:08 UTC
whoops sorry for dropping this on the floor for a bit there.  Review passed.

Comment 8 Andreas Bierfert 2013-11-16 09:56:04 UTC
New Package SCM Request
=======================
Package Name: wmdocker
Short Description: KDE and GNOME2 system tray replacement docking application
Owners: awjb
Branches: f20

Comment 9 Gwyn Ciesla 2013-11-18 13:02:45 UTC
Git done (by process-git-requests).