| Summary: | Missing requirement on dblatex | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Fabian Deutsch <fdeutsch> |
| Component: | asciidoc | Assignee: | Stanislav Ochotnicky <sochotni> |
| Status: | CLOSED NOTABUG | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | 19 | CC: | sochotni, tmz, vonbrand |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2013-09-12 11:45:57 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
|
Description
Fabian Deutsch
2013-09-12 10:52:01 UTC
This was omitted intentionally[1] because not all asciidoc usecases require pdf support (such as html/manpage generation) and dblatex dependency chain is quite huge. What could possibly be done is a fedora-specific patch for a2x that would print some sane error message prompting to install dblatex (or rather latex subpackage). There is asciidoc-latex subpackage that pulls in dblatex and includes additional settings. [1] https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2013-March/179571.html Thanks for the info. The patch is probably a good thing tho power-users might know what to do .. |