Bug 1007936
Summary: | Error message fail - GSpice-WARNING **: invalid SPICE_MAGIC! | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 | Reporter: | Bill Sanford <bsanford> |
Component: | virt-viewer | Assignee: | Virt Viewer Maint <virt-viewer-maint> |
Status: | CLOSED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | Virtualization Bugs <virt-bugs> |
Severity: | low | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | 6.5 | CC: | acathrow, cfergeau, dblechte, marcandre.lureau, mkrcmari, pvine, vipatel |
Target Milestone: | rc | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2013-10-15 01:07:11 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Bill Sanford
2013-09-13 15:16:50 UTC
You probably have some daemons listening on port 22 and 25 (ssh and smtp), which would send some data to remote-viewer when it attempts to connect. The client tells you this data does not match what it expects. I'm not exactly sure what you'd expect in this situation? No GSpice-Warning at all? Or something else? Every other port replies with "GSpice-WARNING **: Connection refused." I kind of expect that instead of the "GSpice-WARNING **: invalid SPICE_MAGIC!" where I made reference to in the initial description. Oh, BTW, this is on a single RHEL 6.5 instance where the remote-viewer is being launched by the command-line. (In reply to Bill Sanford from comment #2) > Every other port replies with "GSpice-WARNING **: Connection refused." > > I kind of expect that instead of the "GSpice-WARNING **: invalid > SPICE_MAGIC!" where I made reference to in the initial description. Imo 'invalid SPICE_MAGIC' is more correct than 'connection refused' in this case. We could reword the warning message if you think that's useful, but I don't think it's that important. If you install more services on your box, you'll get this message for more ports. I agree with Christophe, closing for now |