Bug 1009585
Summary: | Exceptions could be ignored on subsequent JBPM process calls | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [JBoss] JBoss Fuse Service Works 6 | Reporter: | David Ward <dward> |
Component: | SwitchYard | Assignee: | David Ward <dward> |
Status: | CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE | QA Contact: | Jiri Pechanec <jpechane> |
Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | 6.0.0 GA | CC: | kbabo, ldimaggi, soa-p-jira |
Target Milestone: | ER7 | ||
Target Release: | 6.0.0 | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | All | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | Type: | Bug | |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
David Ward
2013-09-18 16:22:19 UTC
David Ward <dward> made a comment on jira SWITCHYARD-1699 https://github.com/jboss-switchyard/components/pull/572 The submitted example now works, and everything else regression tests. The problem had nothing to do with our jBPM integration. It had to do with fault mapping when the configured mapping was exactly the same as the default, but the behavior differed. It is now the same. Keith Babo <kbabo> made a comment on jira SWITCHYARD-1699 pushed Verified in ER8 Keith Babo <kbabo> updated the status of jira SWITCHYARD-1699 to Closed |