Bug 1009585 - Exceptions could be ignored on subsequent JBPM process calls
Summary: Exceptions could be ignored on subsequent JBPM process calls
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE
Alias: None
Product: JBoss Fuse Service Works 6
Classification: JBoss
Component: SwitchYard
Version: 6.0.0 GA
Hardware: All
OS: All
unspecified
high
Target Milestone: ER7
: 6.0.0
Assignee: David Ward
QA Contact: Jiri Pechanec
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2013-09-18 16:22 UTC by David Ward
Modified: 2014-06-16 23:52 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:
Type: Bug

Attachments (Terms of Use)
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Issue Tracker SWITCHYARD-1699 0 Major Closed Exceptions could be ignored on subsequent JBPM process calls 2014-06-16 23:52:07 UTC

Description David Ward 2013-09-18 16:22:19 UTC 
See JBoss JIRA: SWITCHYARD-1699
Comment 2 JBoss JIRA Server 2013-09-18 16:57:27 UTC 
David Ward <dward> made a comment on jira SWITCHYARD-1699

https://github.com/jboss-switchyard/components/pull/572

The submitted example now works, and everything else regression tests.

The problem had nothing to do with our jBPM integration. It had to do with fault mapping when the configured mapping was exactly the same as the default, but the behavior differed.  It is now the same.
Comment 3 JBoss JIRA Server 2013-10-01 13:43:06 UTC 
Keith Babo <kbabo> made a comment on jira SWITCHYARD-1699

pushed
Comment 7 Jiri Pechanec 2014-01-07 13:57:30 UTC 
Verified in ER8
Comment 8 JBoss JIRA Server 2014-06-16 23:52:07 UTC 
Keith Babo <kbabo> updated the status of jira SWITCHYARD-1699 to Closed
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.