Bug 100968

Summary:	Status Report e-mail with a system listed twice
Product:	[Retired] Red Hat Network	Reporter:	Patrick C. F. Ernzer <pcfe>
Component:	RHN/Other	Assignee:	Bret McMillan <bretm>
Status:	CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE	QA Contact:	Red Hat Satellite QA List <satqe-list>
Severity:	low	Docs Contact:
Priority:	low
Version:	RHN Stable	CC:	rhn-bugs
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2003-08-26 13:40:59 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:
Bug Blocks:	99024

Description Patrick C. F. Ernzer 2003-07-28 06:27:20 UTC

From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.2.1) Gecko/20030225

Description of problem:
Just a minor issue, but still to be cleaned up:

I just got the e-mail below:
[start]
Date:  Mon, 28 Jul 2003 02:02:10 -0400
From: Red Hat Network <dev-null.com>
Subject: RHN Daily Status Report for 2003-07-28
[...]
Message-id: <200307280602.h6S62Ao06807.redhat.com>
[...]
X-RHN-Login: pcfe
[...]
Systems Not Checking In:
-------------------------
The following systems recently stopped checking in with Red Hat Network:

System Id System Name Last Checkin
1003058416 vmware on morn: RHL 8.0 2003-07-26 20:27:32 (CET)
1003058416 vmware on morn: RHL 8.0 2003-07-26 20:27:32 (CET)
1002391823 vmware: 7.2 buildhost on 2003-07-26 19:20:39 (CET)
[...]
[end]

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. have system not register because it is off (a powered down VMware in this case)
2. have Status Reports switched on
3. receive e-mail

Actual Results:  System 1003058416 is listed twice

Expected Results:  each affected system listed only once

Additional info:

Comment 1 Bret McMillan 2003-08-01 18:39:54 UTC

Hm.  Missed a DISTINCT in the query :/

Fixed in HEAD.

Comment 2 Greg DeKoenigsberg 2003-08-13 21:41:58 UTC

DOCS: None, it's a bugfix.

TEST PLAN: Looks like Patrick's test plan has it covered.

Comment 3 Josef Komenda 2003-08-18 16:50:24 UTC

If I remember correctly, taskomatic is iffy in webdev, so I'll get this in QA.

Comment 4 Josef Komenda 2003-08-21 22:04:41 UTC

We'll see.

Comment 5 Josef Komenda 2003-08-26 13:40:59 UTC

Looks good