Bug 1017371

Summary:	Verification of openswan package fails
Product:	Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6	Reporter:	Alicja Kario <hkario>
Component:	openswan	Assignee:	Paul Wouters <pwouters>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:	Ondrej Moriš <omoris>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	6.5	CC:	amarecek, eparis, omoris, tlavigne
Target Milestone:	rc	Keywords:	TestBlocker
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2013-11-21 23:48:17 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Alicja Kario 2013-10-09 17:57:10 UTC

Description of problem:
After installing nss and ca-certificates dependent errata, verification of openswan package using `rpm -V` fails.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
openswan-2.6.32-25.el6.x86_64

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. chmod 755 /etc/prelink.conf.d
2. yum install openswan
3. rpm -V openswan
4. ls -lha /etc/prelink.conf.d
5. chmod 755 /etc/prelink.conf.d
6. rpm -V openswan

Actual results:
[root@rhel6-64 ~]# rpm -V openswan
[root@rhel6-64 ~]# ls -lha /etc/prelink.conf.d/
total 20K
drwx------.   2 root root 4.0K Oct  9 19:55 .
drwxr-xr-x. 100 root root  12K Oct  9 19:55 ..
-rw-r--r--.   1 root root   23 Oct  2 23:51 openswan-fips.conf
[root@rhel6-64 ~]# chmod 755 /etc/prelink.conf.d/
[root@rhel6-64 ~]# rpm -V openswan
.M.......    /etc/prelink.conf.d

Expected results:
openswan should leave the directory mode alone or default to 755

Additional info:

Comment 6 errata-xmlrpc 2013-11-21 23:48:17 UTC

Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2013-1718.html