Bug 1017499
| Summary: | bamf-0.5 is available | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Christopher Meng <i> |
| Component: | bamf | Assignee: | Michel Lind <michel> |
| Status: | CLOSED RAWHIDE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | rawhide | CC: | jspaleta, michel |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2014-02-14 08:45:07 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
| Bug Depends On: | |||
| Bug Blocks: | 896193 | ||
|
Description
Christopher Meng
2013-10-10 03:41:32 UTC
ping after a month. Help this one ;) Hi Christopher, Apologies for the delay. The update is now almost ready, after swatting a couple of compile-warning-treated-as-error. I'm double-checking a build failure on Rawhide -- looks like GCC is getting even stricter there (the last statement in a function produces a value, and the function is void, but there was no return statement -- and yet when GCC produces an error it claims there was a return): http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/9450/6529450/build.log so for the moment, please use the test package in COPR for testing. I'll try reproducing the Rawhide issue in mock, and if necessary just hack a void return to make GCC happy: http://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/salimma/bamf05/ Aha, turns out it's fixed in a post-release commit (and I was looking at trunk since I was working on a compile warning fix there). Now built for Rawhide. Do you need an update for F20 as well? It's quite a major update and there are no longer separate GTK2 and GTK3 support, so I guess I'll keep the COPR repo up for F20 testing in case we want to do that. I don't need it for f20. But you can build one and push in testing. Plank doesn't depends on the latest version, but we can have a try(Be careful if you want to add buildroot override.) Thank you! |