Bug 1017550
| Summary: | Server returns HTTP response code 500 for WSDL url | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [JBoss] JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 6 | Reporter: | Petr Sakař <psakar> |
| Component: | Web Services | Assignee: | Alessio Soldano <asoldano> |
| Status: | CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE | QA Contact: | Rostislav Svoboda <rsvoboda> |
| Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | Russell Dickenson <rdickens> |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | 6.2.0 | CC: | asoldano, brian.stansberry, myarboro, nobody, smumford |
| Target Milestone: | ER7 | ||
| Target Release: | EAP 6.2.0 | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Known Issue | |
| Doc Text: |
Cause:
Consequence:
Workaround (if any):
Results:
|
Story Points: | --- |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2013-12-15 16:15:36 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Petr Sakař
2013-10-10 07:11:34 UTC
Upstream jira: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBWS-3717 As per Petr analysis, the actual reason for the problem here should be https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBWS-3719 JBWS-3717 could also cause the same effect, but is most likely not the first culprit here. Alessio Soldano <asoldano> updated the status of jira JBWS-3719 to Closed Alessio Soldano <asoldano> updated the status of jira JBWS-3717 to Closed verified - I've check test failures with symptoms described are not present on EAP 6.2.0.ER7 I can see from comments in this and attached JIRAs that the server error was being caused by incorrect endpoints being returned. But I'm not able to ascertain how this was corrected. With EAP 6.2 GA looming, I'm requesting a draft release note text (including layman's description of the problem and the fix) be supplied in the Doc Text field above. Any and all help is appreciated, Alessio. Scott, honestly I believe we don't need any release note here. This issue was a consequence of changes that were applied in a early 6.2 ER, so not something the customer can have experimented at all. Thanks for the update Alessio. I've marked this for exclusion from the release notes. |