Bug 1018327
Summary: | ipsec.conf man page lacks example for AES-GCM configuration | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 | Reporter: | Hubert Kario <hkario> | ||||
Component: | openswan | Assignee: | Paul Wouters <pwouters> | ||||
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Aleš Mareček <amarecek> | ||||
Severity: | low | Docs Contact: | |||||
Priority: | unspecified | ||||||
Version: | 6.5 | CC: | amarecek, arubin, eparis | ||||
Target Milestone: | rc | ||||||
Target Release: | --- | ||||||
Hardware: | All | ||||||
OS: | Linux | ||||||
Whiteboard: | |||||||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |||||
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||
Clone Of: | |||||||
: | 1162770 (view as bug list) | Environment: | |||||
Last Closed: | 2014-10-14 08:18:54 UTC | Type: | Bug | ||||
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||
Embargoed: | |||||||
Bug Depends On: | |||||||
Bug Blocks: | 1162770 | ||||||
Attachments: |
|
Description
Hubert Kario
2013-10-11 17:28:02 UTC
This request was not resolved in time for the current release. Red Hat invites you to ask your support representative to propose this request, if still desired, for consideration in the next release of Red Hat Enterprise Linux. Attached the updated phase2alg.xml file. This can be replace the openswan version on the next openswan update we do. Sorry we missed it on this one. Created attachment 863088 [details]
replacement phase2alg.xml
replacement phase2alg.xml
(In reply to Paul Wouters from comment #4) > Created attachment 863088 [details] > replacement phase2alg.xml > > replacement phase2alg.xml Looks good. One extra thing, since it's in the same section of man page. Would it be possible to list the available DH group sizes explicitly? While RFC5114 does list some parameters, it doesn't say which is which (e.g. doesn't say that the dh1 is 768bit, dh2 is 1024, etc.). Higher group sizes like 1536 bit or 2048 bit are even harder to find... spelling: > adding the salt size to the key size. Therefor, to interop with an older s/Therefor/Therefore/ it probably should also be interoperate, not interop > are necessarilly supported here.</para> s/necessarilly/necessarily/ Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2014-1588.html |