Bug 1022404
Summary: | Remote-Viewer: Zoom Out Behavior Is Not Consistent | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 | Reporter: | tingting zheng <tzheng> |
Component: | virt-viewer | Assignee: | Virt Viewer Maint <virt-viewer-maint> |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Virtualization Bugs <virt-bugs> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | 7.0 | CC: | cfergeau, codong, dblechte, dyuan, gkong, jjongsma, marcandre.lureau, mzhan, rbalakri, tzheng, vipatel |
Target Milestone: | rc | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | x86_64 | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | virt-viewer-0.6.0-1.el7 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
Doc Text: |
Zooming in and out on a window in virt-viewer/remote-viewer would sometimes cause the guest display to be resized rather than simply scaling the local display.
After this change, the guest display will never be resized in response to zooming in or out in the client (view > zoom > zoom in / zoom out). It will simply scale the display up or down.
|
Story Points: | --- |
Clone Of: | 1004051 | Environment: | |
Last Closed: | 2015-03-05 13:38:16 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | 1004051 | ||
Bug Blocks: |
Comment 1
Marc-Andre Lureau
2014-07-03 22:25:51 UTC
I can reproduce this bug with: virt-viewer-0.5.7-7.el7.x86_64 Tested with: virt-viewer-0.6.0-1.el7.x86_64 Set the original resolution of the guest as 1280x768,when zoom out several times,it will not change.Also tried some other resolutions,when zoom out,the resolution will not change,so move the bug to VERIFIED. Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2015-0295.html |