Bug 1023351
Summary: | Error : EXT4-fs error (device sda8): ext4_ext_search_left: inode #8126473: (comm db2sysc) ix (60672) != EXT_FIRST_INDEX (0) (depth 1)! leads to DB2 instance to crash | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 | Reporter: | Jan Kurik <jkurik> |
Component: | e2fsprogs | Assignee: | Eric Sandeen <esandeen> |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Eryu Guan <eguan> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | high | ||
Version: | 6.3 | CC: | atomlin, cww, eguan, ekuric, esandeen, fs-maint, jcastillo, jharriga, jsvarova, kdudka, lmcilroy, mgandhi, plambri, pm-eus, rwheeler, sauchter, sct, spanjikk, vincent |
Target Milestone: | rc | Keywords: | ZStream |
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: |
The resize2fs utility did not properly handle resizing of an ext4 file system to a smaller size. As a consequence, files containing many extents could become corrupted if they were moved during the resize process. With this update, resize2fs now maintains a consistent extent tree when moving files containing many extents, and such files no longer become corrupted in this scenario.
|
Story Points: | --- |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2013-11-05 15:10:47 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | 873201 | ||
Bug Blocks: |
Description
Jan Kurik
2013-10-25 09:05:03 UTC
Test with /e2fsprogs/Regression/bz873201-resize2fs-shrink-move-extent-corruption, test passed, set to VERIFIED. Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2013-1502.html |