Bug 1023351

Summary: Error : EXT4-fs error (device sda8): ext4_ext_search_left: inode #8126473: (comm db2sysc) ix (60672) != EXT_FIRST_INDEX (0) (depth 1)! leads to DB2 instance to crash
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 Reporter: Jan Kurik <jkurik>
Component: e2fsprogsAssignee: Eric Sandeen <esandeen>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Eryu Guan <eguan>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: high    
Version: 6.3CC: atomlin, cww, eguan, ekuric, esandeen, fs-maint, jcastillo, jharriga, jsvarova, kdudka, lmcilroy, mgandhi, plambri, pm-eus, rwheeler, sauchter, sct, spanjikk, vincent
Target Milestone: rcKeywords: ZStream
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
The resize2fs utility did not properly handle resizing of an ext4 file system to a smaller size. As a consequence, files containing many extents could become corrupted if they were moved during the resize process. With this update, resize2fs now maintains a consistent extent tree when moving files containing many extents, and such files no longer become corrupted in this scenario.
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2013-11-05 15:10:47 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On: 873201    
Bug Blocks:    

Description Jan Kurik 2013-10-25 09:05:03 UTC
This bug has been copied from bug #873201 and has been proposed
to be backported to 6.4 z-stream (EUS).

Comment 6 Eryu Guan 2013-10-28 06:12:33 UTC
Test with /e2fsprogs/Regression/bz873201-resize2fs-shrink-move-extent-corruption, test passed, set to VERIFIED.

Comment 8 errata-xmlrpc 2013-11-05 15:10:47 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2013-1502.html