Red Hat Bugzilla – Full Text Bug Listing
|Summary:||sendmail should be included explicitly for Fedora 20|
|Product:||[Community] Beaker||Reporter:||Amit Saha <asaha>|
|Status:||CLOSED NOTABUG||QA Contact:||tools-bugs <tools-bugs>|
|Version:||develop||CC:||aigao, asaha, dcallagh, ebaak, llim, qwan, rmancy|
|Fixed In Version:||Doc Type:||Bug Fix|
|Doc Text:||Story Points:||---|
|Last Closed:||2013-11-11 00:12:47 EST||Type:||Bug|
|oVirt Team:||---||RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:|
Description Amit Saha 2013-10-29 00:44:05 EDT
Description of problem: Fedora 20 removed sendmail from @core, hence we will have to include it in the Fedora kickstarts (conditional if Fedora 20 is provisioned). Traceback in reserversys task: Redirecting to /bin/systemctl start sendmail.service Failed to issue method call: Unit sendmail.service failed to load: No such file or directory. See system logs and 'systemctl status sendmail.service' for details. ./runtest.sh: line 175: sendmail: command not found Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: Expected results: Additional info:
Comment 1 Nick Coghlan 2013-10-29 02:15:15 EDT
Isn't this just a missing dependency in the reservesys task definition?
Comment 2 Amit Saha 2013-10-29 03:00:31 EDT
(In reply to Nick Coghlan from comment #1) > Isn't this just a missing dependency in the reservesys task definition? Good question that. So I think the question to ask here, is it going to be only required for the proper functionality of the reservesys task? If so, yes the reservesys's tasks's dependency list should have sendmail in it.
Comment 3 Amit Saha 2013-11-11 00:12:47 EST
'sendmail' is already listed as a dependency for reservesys. Turns out 'sendmail' was missing from the mirror I was provisioning Fedora from.