Bug 1025112
Summary: | zanata-cli: Incorrect BASE_JARS | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Ding-Yi Chen <dchen> |
Component: | zanata-client | Assignee: | Ding-Yi Chen <dchen> |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | urgent | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | 19 | CC: | dchen, pahuang, rlandman, sflaniga, zanata-bugs |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | zanata-client-2.2.0-3.fc19 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2014-02-10 02:58:13 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Ding-Yi Chen
2013-10-31 03:21:38 UTC
*** Bug 1004136 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** What does CLOSED(NEXTRELEASE) mean for zanata-cli? I don't think we should use NEXTRELEASE for Zanata. Or should this bug be reassigned to the Fedora project? Even if it is a bug in the Fedora package for zanata-cli, we should really fix a bug like this one in fedora-updates, not just the next release. Also, which version actually has the fix? For fedora releases, it is recommend to use bodhi and fill the bug number. After the fix been pushed as stable, it would automatically close the bug and fill in Fix in number. This was fixed in zanata-client-2.2.0-3.fc19 and zanata-client-2.2.0-3.fc18 |