Bug 1025881
Summary: | clvmd -R fails - "EOF reading CLVMD" | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 | Reporter: | Corey Marthaler <cmarthal> |
Component: | lvm2-cluster | Assignee: | Petr Rockai <prockai> |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Cluster QE <mspqa-list> |
Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | high | ||
Version: | 5.10 | CC: | agk, ccaulfie, cmarthal, dwysocha, heinzm, jbrassow, lmiksik, mjuricek, msnitzer, nperic, prajnoha, prockai, snagar, thornber, zkabelac |
Target Milestone: | rc | Keywords: | Regression, TestBlocker |
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | x86_64 | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | lvm2-cluster-2.02.88-10.el5 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2014-09-16 00:24:43 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 1049888 |
Description
Corey Marthaler
2013-11-01 19:42:29 UTC
Is this a regression (maybe related to 25bed9968155f43ef0b8832383ef711e7ae1685d)? Also, I assume that lvm can talk to clvmd as usual... (what I find suspicious is that we have a regression test for clvmd -R, so we should have noticed if it broke). I'll have a closer look. The problem is, as far as I can tell, that f5d39ec97aed3a77b5d0dfcd954dd78547e5748d needs to be backported to the RHEL5 package of 2.02.88 -- presumably 63b8ed7c37d166efd6f7e24bad8f64a2bc3239ef went in but that breaks clvmd -R without f5d39ec... in exactly the manner seen on 5.10.z packages. Marking VERIFIED based on Comment 9 and test with lvm2-2.02.88-12.el5 as well [root@virt-066 ~]# clvmd -R [root@virt-066 ~]# rpm -q lvm2 lvm2-2.02.88-12.el5 Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2014-1219.html The needinfo request[s] on this closed bug have been removed as they have been unresolved for 1000 days |