Bug 1028216
Summary: | The check-valid-connection-sql tag is ignored | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [JBoss] JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 6 | Reporter: | Juan Hernández <juan.hernandez> |
Component: | JCA | Assignee: | Jesper Pedersen <jpederse> |
Status: | CLOSED NOTABUG | QA Contact: | Vladimir Rastseluev <vrastsel> |
Severity: | urgent | Docs Contact: | Russell Dickenson <rdickens> |
Priority: | urgent | ||
Version: | 6.2.0 | CC: | bazulay, cpelland, emesika, jpederse, juan.hernandez, mperina, myarboro, pslavice, ylavi |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | EAP 6.2.0 | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2013-11-25 13:30:00 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 742505, 1024990 |
Description
Juan Hernández
2013-11-07 22:47:12 UTC
Can you please update on this bug? We are experiencing several severe bug in rhev as a result of this. Yaniv Please, add either <background-validation>true</background-validation> or <validate-on-match>true</validate-on-match> to the <validation> element. It is considered best practice to use the dedicated <valid-connection-checker> element for each database type. (In reply to Jesper Pedersen from comment #3) > Please, add either <background-validation>true</background-validation> or > <validate-on-match>true</validate-on-match> to the <validation> element. > > It is considered best practice to use the dedicated > <valid-connection-checker> element for each database type. Can you please check, if this fix applies to us and that heartbeat works after this is applied? Yaniv I added <validate-on-match>true</validate-on-match> to our data source definition and it changes the behavior: the validation is now performed correctly. This solves the problem for us, thus I am closing as not a bug. |