Bug 1033928
| Summary: | file conflict with rubygem-openshift-origin-common | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Michael S. <misc> | |
| Component: | openshift-origin-broker | Assignee: | Troy Dawson <tdawson> | |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> | |
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | ||
| Priority: | unspecified | |||
| Version: | 20 | CC: | admiller, bleanhar, mike.haller, tdawson | |
| Target Milestone: | --- | |||
| Target Release: | --- | |||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | |||
| OS: | Unspecified | |||
| Whiteboard: | ||||
| Fixed In Version: | rubygem-openshift-origin-common-1.13.0.1-2.fc20 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | ||
| Clone Of: | ||||
| : | 1075779 (view as bug list) | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2013-12-14 02:43:48 UTC | Type: | Bug | |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | ||
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | ||
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | ||
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | ||
| Embargoed: | ||||
|
Description
Michael S.
2013-11-24 12:38:44 UTC
I have fixed rubygem-openshift-origin-common, because that is where this was fixed upstream. Although I am fixing this, I am a little confused. In both packages, /etc/openshift/plugins.d is marked as a directory. You can (or could) have multiple packages owning the same directory. Is this conflict a "feature" that is coming in F20? Or is this a bug in rpm? If this is a new "feature", I would like to see the argument for it. I currently don't agree with it. rubygem-openshift-origin-common-1.13.0.1-2.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rubygem-openshift-origin-common-1.13.0.1-2.fc20 It could just be that the files are not identical in both rpm, because that's the main problem when you do that. IE, any file owner, group or permission change must be coordinated between the rpm, and this is not really sustainable. SO I would still recommend to avoid double ownership if it can be avoided. Aha, you are correct. One has the directory owned by root, and one has it owned by apache. I do agree with you that is possible, that directory ownership should be consolidated, which openshift upstream as been trying to do. I was just concerned that there was a change in F20 rpm I wasn't aware of. There have been so many other changes recently that I guess I'm a little gunshy. Package rubygem-openshift-origin-common-1.13.0.1-2.fc20: * should fix your issue, * was pushed to the Fedora 20 testing repository, * should be available at your local mirror within two days. Update it with: # su -c 'yum update --enablerepo=updates-testing rubygem-openshift-origin-common-1.13.0.1-2.fc20' as soon as you are able to. Please go to the following url: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-22101/rubygem-openshift-origin-common-1.13.0.1-2.fc20 then log in and leave karma (feedback). rubygem-openshift-origin-common-1.13.0.1-2.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. Let me know if I should open a new bug, however the issue seems to be occurring again with bumped versions of both packages: Transaction check error: file /etc/openshift/plugins.d from install of openshift-origin-broker-1.15.1.2-1.fc20.noarch conflicts with file from package rubygem-openshift-origin-common-1.18.0.2-1.fc20.noarch |