Bug 1034802
Summary: | During installation the DC name is asked but later, only default is in | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization Manager | Reporter: | Pablo Iranzo Gómez <pablo.iranzo> |
Component: | ovirt-hosted-engine-setup | Assignee: | Sandro Bonazzola <sbonazzo> |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | movciari |
Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | 3.3.0 | CC: | dfediuck, didi, iheim, lyarwood, oschreib, pstehlik, sbonazzo, scohen |
Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | Triaged |
Target Release: | 3.3.0 | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | integration | ||
Fixed In Version: | ovirt-hosted-engine-setup-1.0.0-0.10.1.rc.el6ev | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2014-01-21 16:55:54 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 1020228 |
Description
Pablo Iranzo Gómez
2013-11-26 14:25:17 UTC
Not sure how to handle this, since the data center name here is intended to identify the storage data center where the VM image will be stored. Since that storage domain should not appear in the manager I think we can just hide the question and use a default value there, avoiding confusion for the user. Sandro, probably that's the best option, unless, in the future, it is expected to share the storage (SD) among other VM's. I will find it very usefull once we can have the hosted using localhost storage (native gluster) so it can be really a fully-contained environment. Pablo, I agree but it will take time to get there. So for now, we're going to resolve this issue by adding a text to the installer explaining that this name is internal and will not be visible in the UI. Alex, please take care of this. patch merged on upstream master and 1.0 branches. Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2014-0083.html |