Bug 1035088
| Summary: | missing the description of 'lookupcache' mount option in nfs(5) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 | Reporter: | masanari iida <masanari_iida> |
| Component: | man-pages-ja | Assignee: | Akira TAGOH <tagoh> |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | QE Internationalization Bugs <qe-i18n-bugs> |
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | 6.3 | CC: | eng-i18n-bugs, jherrman, lijli |
| Target Milestone: | rc | Keywords: | i18n |
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: |
The Japanese version of the nfs(5) manual page has been updated to reflect the current English version more closely.
|
Story Points: | --- |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2014-06-10 12:24:53 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
masanari iida
2013-11-27 04:46:54 UTC
To clarify the request against this bug: (In reply to masanari iida from comment #0) > What is different > (1) Missing options > The Japanese man page does not include "lookupcache" option. > This is one of an important option for the users who is suffering > from NFS trouble. If Japanese user sees only NFS man page in > Japanese, they can not find it. > > (2) Different explanations > For example, timeo in English man page, it include an explanation > about both NFS over TCP and NFS over UDP cases. > But in Japanese man page, it doesn't tell about NFS over TCP. > > So that's why I prefer just add "lookupcache" into old NFS man page, > but update whole contents to newer one. Are you expecting to add the "lookupcache" description only in the nfs(5) Japanese man page? I'm not sure how those explains why you prefer just adding "lookupcache" description rather than synchronizing to the original though, if it is, I'm getting confused with the expected results in comment#0. Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2014-0681.html |