Bug 1036567
| Summary: | why ExclusiveArch? | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Dan Horák <dan> |
| Component: | springlobby | Assignee: | Gilboa Davara <gilboad> |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | 20 | CC: | gilboad |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | springlobby-0.169-8.fc19 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2013-12-23 03:44:06 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
| Bug Depends On: | |||
| Bug Blocks: | 467765 | ||
|
Description
Dan Horák
2013-12-02 09:56:13 UTC
It should be %{ix86} x86_64. Thanks.
As for arm, its not officially supported [1] by springrts and its unlikely that it will be officially supported in the foreseeable future.
I'll fix the broken ExclusiveArch ASAP.
- Gilboa
[1] http://springrts.com/wiki/Spring_on_ARM
Rechecked: The ExclusiveArch is i386 x86_64 which covers the currently supported platforms.
(I had a weird build issues with mock when using %{ix86} and was pressed on time to get it working). Is it %{ix86} vs. "i386 x86_64" considered nice to have or required?
- Gilboa
(In reply to Gilboa Davara from comment #2) > Rechecked: The ExclusiveArch is i386 x86_64 which covers the currently > supported platforms. > (I had a weird build issues with mock when using %{ix86} and was pressed on > time to get it working). Is it %{ix86} vs. "i386 x86_64" considered nice to > have or required? having i386 in the list means there is no 32-bit variant built as Fedora builds as i686 Also still I don't see the reason for the ExclusiveArch as the package builds fine on ARM (http://arm.koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=172161), ppc/ppc64 and s390/s390x and there is no report from non-x86 arch in Fedora stating it doesn't work or it crashes. And when it will appear then the arch team can look on it before Exclude/ExclusiveArch is set. That's how things work in Fedora. Dan,
1. I'll issue a fixed build with x86_64 %{ix86}.
2. Builds != Works. Given the fact that spring/arm is considered non-supported-semi-compiles-state and ppc*/s390 are *completely* unsupported by upstream, there's not much I can do if/when bugs are reported. If you're willing to take ownership of spring/arm, I'll be happy to added it to the supported Arch list.
Thanks for the missing arch report.
- Gilboa
springlobby-0.169-8.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/springlobby-0.169-8.fc19 springlobby-0.169-8.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/springlobby-0.169-8.fc20 springlobby-0.169-8.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/springlobby-0.169-8.fc18 spring-95.0-3.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/spring-95.0-3.fc19 spring-95.0-3.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/spring-95.0-3.fc20 spring-95.0-3.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/spring-95.0-3.fc18 Package spring-95.0-3.fc20: * should fix your issue, * was pushed to the Fedora 20 testing repository, * should be available at your local mirror within two days. Update it with: # su -c 'yum update --enablerepo=updates-testing spring-95.0-3.fc20' as soon as you are able to. Please go to the following url: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-22807/spring-95.0-3.fc20 then log in and leave karma (feedback). spring-95.0-3.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. spring-95.0-3.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. springlobby-0.169-8.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. springlobby-0.169-8.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. spring-95.0-3.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. springlobby-0.169-8.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. |