Bug 1038597

Summary: bundle deploy to platform resource fails
Product: [JBoss] JBoss Operations Network Reporter: Armine Hovsepyan <ahovsepy>
Component: ProvisioningAssignee: RHQ Project Maintainer <rhq-maint>
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE QA Contact: Mike Foley <mfoley>
Severity: high Docs Contact:
Priority: high    
Version: JON 3.2CC: ahovsepy, jshaughn, loleary, mfoley, myarboro
Target Milestone: ---Keywords: Regression
Target Release: JON 3.2.1   
Hardware: x86_64   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2014-02-17 23:08:44 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Attachments:
Description Flags
server.log
none
server_nonHA.log none

Comment 1 Armine Hovsepyan 2013-12-05 13:01:18 UTC 
Description of problem:
bundle deploy to platform resource fails 

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
jon 3.2 CR1

How reproducible:
always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Install bundle on a group containing only jon plugin resource
2.
3.

Actual results:
deployment failes


Expected results:
deployment goes correctly as with other resources


Additional info:
attached server.log for HA and non-HA environments
Comment 2 Armine Hovsepyan 2013-12-05 13:03:13 UTC 
Created attachment 833137 [details]
server.log
Comment 3 Armine Hovsepyan 2013-12-05 13:05:56 UTC 
Created attachment 833139 [details]
server_nonHA.log
Comment 6 Larry O'Leary 2014-02-14 16:24:35 UTC 
This sounds bad. It may be related to bug 1060223. We need to verify and address accordingly.
Comment 9 Jay Shaughnessy 2014-02-14 22:09:02 UTC 
I think this is a duplicate of Bug 1060223.  Which means that it's not limited to, but more prevalent on, oracle.
Comment 10 Larry O'Leary 2014-02-14 22:12:02 UTC 
That is what I was thinking too.

I just haven't been able to reproduce it in the same manner and the introduction of HA seems to indicate that the problem is different. However, perhaps HA just makes it more likely? A timing issue?
Comment 14 Larry O'Leary 2014-02-17 23:08:44 UTC 
Bug 1060223 was captured with more details then this bug so I am closing this one as a duplicate.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1060223 ***