Bug 1043614

Summary: [fix available] bogus date in %changelog
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 Reporter: jcpunk
Component: libreoffice-voikkoAssignee: Caolan McNamara <caolanm>
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX QA Contact: Desktop QE <desktop-qa-list>
Severity: low Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 7.0CC: ajb, csieh, jkoten, ovasik, tpelka
Target Milestone: rc   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: All   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2020-02-11 12:59:54 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:

Description jcpunk 2013-12-16 18:19:18 UTC 
Description of problem:The changelog contains bad date range


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):3.3-3.el7


How reproducible: 100%


Steps to Reproduce:
1. rpmbuild --rebuild <SRPM>
2.
3.

Actual results:
warning: bogus date in %changelog: Sun Aug 28 2008 Ville-Pekka Vainio <vpivaini AT cs.helsinki.fi> - 3.0-1
warning: bogus date in %changelog: Sun Jul 30 2008 Ville-Pekka Vainio <vpivaini AT cs.helsinki.fi> - 3.0-0.2.rc1


Expected results:
valid dates

Additional info:
Comment 2 Caolan McNamara 2013-12-18 11:03:46 UTC 
this is fixed in rawhide
Comment 3 Ludek Smid 2014-06-26 10:50:34 UTC 
This request was resolved in Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7.0.

Contact your manager or support representative in case you have further questions about the request.
Comment 4 Ludek Smid 2014-06-26 11:16:29 UTC 
The comment above is incorrect. The correct version is bellow.
I'm sorry for any inconvenience.
---------------------------------------------------------------

This request was NOT resolved in Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7.0.

Contact your manager or support representative in case you need
to escalate this bug.
Comment 9 Caolan McNamara 2020-02-11 12:59:46 UTC 
lets forget it, its trivial and doesn't matter, especially 6 years later
Comment 10 RHEL Program Management 2020-02-11 12:59:54 UTC 
Development Management has reviewed and declined this request. You may appeal this decision by using your Red Hat support channels, who will make certain  the issue receives the proper prioritization with product and development management.

https://www.redhat.com/support/process/production/#howto