Bug 1043614 - [fix available] bogus date in %changelog
Summary: [fix available] bogus date in %changelog
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7
Classification: Red Hat
Component: libreoffice-voikko
Version: 7.0
Hardware: All
OS: All
unspecified
low
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Caolan McNamara
QA Contact: Desktop QE
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2013-12-16 18:19 UTC by jcpunk
Modified: 2020-02-11 12:59 UTC (History)
5 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2020-02-11 12:59:54 UTC
Target Upstream Version:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description jcpunk 2013-12-16 18:19:18 UTC
Description of problem:The changelog contains bad date range


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):3.3-3.el7


How reproducible: 100%


Steps to Reproduce:
1. rpmbuild --rebuild <SRPM>
2.
3.

Actual results:
warning: bogus date in %changelog: Sun Aug 28 2008 Ville-Pekka Vainio <vpivaini AT cs.helsinki.fi> - 3.0-1
warning: bogus date in %changelog: Sun Jul 30 2008 Ville-Pekka Vainio <vpivaini AT cs.helsinki.fi> - 3.0-0.2.rc1


Expected results:
valid dates

Additional info:

Comment 2 Caolan McNamara 2013-12-18 11:03:46 UTC
this is fixed in rawhide

Comment 3 Ludek Smid 2014-06-26 10:50:34 UTC
This request was resolved in Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7.0.

Contact your manager or support representative in case you have further questions about the request.

Comment 4 Ludek Smid 2014-06-26 11:16:29 UTC
The comment above is incorrect. The correct version is bellow.
I'm sorry for any inconvenience.
---------------------------------------------------------------

This request was NOT resolved in Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7.0.

Contact your manager or support representative in case you need
to escalate this bug.

Comment 9 Caolan McNamara 2020-02-11 12:59:46 UTC
lets forget it, its trivial and doesn't matter, especially 6 years later

Comment 10 RHEL Program Management 2020-02-11 12:59:54 UTC
Development Management has reviewed and declined this request. You may appeal this decision by using your Red Hat support channels, who will make certain  the issue receives the proper prioritization with product and development management.

https://www.redhat.com/support/process/production/#howto


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.