Bug 1045032
Summary: | iproute2: "ip -o link" doesn't show devices entries in a single line when reporting SR-IOV devs. | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 | Reporter: | Antoni Segura Puimedon <asegurap> | |
Component: | iproute | Assignee: | Phil Sutter <psutter> | |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Jaroslav Aster <jaster> | |
Severity: | low | Docs Contact: | ||
Priority: | medium | |||
Version: | 6.5 | CC: | bazulay, danken, jaster, mmarusic, rkhan | |
Target Milestone: | rc | |||
Target Release: | --- | |||
Hardware: | Unspecified | |||
OS: | Unspecified | |||
Whiteboard: | ||||
Fixed In Version: | iproute-2.6.32-47.el6 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | ||
Clone Of: | ||||
: | 1272405 1272406 (view as bug list) | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2016-05-11 00:18:40 UTC | Type: | Bug | |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | ||
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | ||
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | ||
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | ||
Embargoed: | ||||
Bug Depends On: | ||||
Bug Blocks: | 1172231, 1275424 |
Description
Antoni Segura Puimedon
2013-12-19 13:43:11 UTC
I have not checked Fedora nor RHEL-7.0 Beta, but they are likely to have the same issue, it should be checked and cloned if it is the case. Wouldn't it be even nicer if each vf reported its parent pf? It seems that currently we must depend on the iface naming convention to do this mapping, or go /sys/class. @Danken: maybe something like "physfn eth1". (In reply to Dan Kenigsberg from comment #3) > Wouldn't it be even nicer if each vf reported its parent pf? That's a good idea, better than putting all the vf on the same line with the parent interface. Wile I agree with the opinion that VF interfaces should list which physical one they belong to, I don't think this belongs to this ticket. A quick research shows that the kernel exports a list of virtual functions for the physical interface, and iproute reflects just that. So changing the way things are presented might need some preliminary kernel work. I'll clone this ticket into an RFE one to keep me reminded to investigate further. This ticket is about the bug in output formatting, which is indeed present and valid. Patch fixing this sent upstream: http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=144499191904348&w=2 Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2016-0895.html |