Bug 1055179

Summary: The LVM block storage host group name should be changed to Cinder Block storage
Product: Red Hat OpenStack Reporter: Yogev Rabl <yrabl>
Component: openstack-foreman-installerAssignee: Crag Wolfe <cwolfe>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: nlevinki <nlevinki>
Severity: low Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 4.0CC: dron, jguiditt, mburns, morazi, rhos-maint, yeylon
Target Milestone: ga   
Target Release: Installer   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard: storage
Fixed In Version: openstack-foreman-installer-2.0.3-1.el6ost Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
: 1100459 (view as bug list) Environment:
Last Closed: 2014-08-21 18:03:53 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 1064889, 1100459    

Description Yogev Rabl 2014-01-19 12:09:33 UTC 
Description of problem:
The LVM is just one of the available storage backends, it is misleading and incorrect. Please change it

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
foreman-mysql-1.3.0.1-1.el6sat.noarch
openstack-foreman-installer-1.0.2-1.el6ost.noarch
foreman-selinux-1.3.0-1.el6sat.noarch
ruby193-rubygem-foreman_openstack_simplify-0.0.6-5.el6ost.noarch
foreman-installer-1.3.0-1.el6sat.noarch
foreman-mysql2-1.3.0.1-1.el6sat.noarch
rubygem-foreman_api-0.1.6-1.el6sat.noarch
foreman-1.3.0.1-1.el6sat.noarch
foreman-proxy-1.3.0-3.el6sat.noarch
Comment 2 Dafna Ron 2014-02-13 12:48:25 UTC 
cinder has a lot of backends and it fundamentally wrong to call a host group lvm. 
installation with packstack at this time supports lvm,gluster and nfs. 
cinder hostgroup should be changed to support all these backends (and even the name should reflect that). 
packstack at this point shows this: CONFIG_CINDER_BACKEND
Comment 3 Crag Wolfe 2014-05-30 18:22:54 UTC 
https://github.com/redhat-openstack/astapor/pull/242
Comment 4 Mike Burns 2014-06-02 12:07:43 UTC 
patch merged upstream, moving to POST
Comment 13 nlevinki 2014-08-07 07:53:50 UTC 
this ticket is not relevant to staypuf, I checked staypuf cinder attributes and we don't have "lvm block storage" or "cinder block storage" attributes any more
Comment 15 errata-xmlrpc 2014-08-21 18:03:53 UTC 
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2014-1090.html