Bug 1055179 - The LVM block storage host group name should be changed to Cinder Block storage
Summary: The LVM block storage host group name should be changed to Cinder Block storage
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat OpenStack
Classification: Red Hat
Component: openstack-foreman-installer
Version: 4.0
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
medium
low
Target Milestone: ga
: Installer
Assignee: Crag Wolfe
QA Contact: nlevinki
URL:
Whiteboard: storage
Depends On:
Blocks: 1064889 1100459
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2014-01-19 12:09 UTC by Yogev Rabl
Modified: 2016-04-26 21:01 UTC (History)
6 users (show)

Fixed In Version: openstack-foreman-installer-2.0.3-1.el6ost
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
: 1100459 (view as bug list)
Environment:
Last Closed: 2014-08-21 18:03:53 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2014:1090 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE Red Hat Enterprise Linux OpenStack Platform Enhancement Advisory 2014-08-22 15:28:08 UTC

Description Yogev Rabl 2014-01-19 12:09:33 UTC 
Description of problem:
The LVM is just one of the available storage backends, it is misleading and incorrect. Please change it

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
foreman-mysql-1.3.0.1-1.el6sat.noarch
openstack-foreman-installer-1.0.2-1.el6ost.noarch
foreman-selinux-1.3.0-1.el6sat.noarch
ruby193-rubygem-foreman_openstack_simplify-0.0.6-5.el6ost.noarch
foreman-installer-1.3.0-1.el6sat.noarch
foreman-mysql2-1.3.0.1-1.el6sat.noarch
rubygem-foreman_api-0.1.6-1.el6sat.noarch
foreman-1.3.0.1-1.el6sat.noarch
foreman-proxy-1.3.0-3.el6sat.noarch
Comment 2 Dafna Ron 2014-02-13 12:48:25 UTC 
cinder has a lot of backends and it fundamentally wrong to call a host group lvm. 
installation with packstack at this time supports lvm,gluster and nfs. 
cinder hostgroup should be changed to support all these backends (and even the name should reflect that). 
packstack at this point shows this: CONFIG_CINDER_BACKEND
Comment 3 Crag Wolfe 2014-05-30 18:22:54 UTC 
https://github.com/redhat-openstack/astapor/pull/242
Comment 4 Mike Burns 2014-06-02 12:07:43 UTC 
patch merged upstream, moving to POST
Comment 13 nlevinki 2014-08-07 07:53:50 UTC 
this ticket is not relevant to staypuf, I checked staypuf cinder attributes and we don't have "lvm block storage" or "cinder block storage" attributes any more
Comment 15 errata-xmlrpc 2014-08-21 18:03:53 UTC 
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2014-1090.html
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.