Bug 1062438
Summary: | RHEV 3.3 adding new host causes error logging for an attempt to remove host | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization Manager | Reporter: | Dave Sullivan <dsulliva> |
Component: | ovirt-engine | Assignee: | Liran Zelkha <lzelkha> |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Tareq Alayan <talayan> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | 3.3.0 | CC: | aberezin, acathrow, adahms, bazulay, dsulliva, emesika, iheim, lpeer, pstehlik, Rhev-m-bugs, wdaniel, yeylon, yzaslavs |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | 3.4.0 | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | infra | ||
Fixed In Version: | av3 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
Doc Text: |
With this update, errors are no longer raised by the RemoveVdsCommand when an operation to add a host fails and the changes made up to that failure are rolled back by the Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization Manager.
|
Story Points: | --- |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2014-06-09 15:03:41 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | Infra | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 1078909, 1142926 |
Description
Dave Sullivan
2014-02-06 23:20:44 UTC
From the log this is what I see 1) You are trying to add a Host 2) It is first added to the database 3) The Add AddVdsCommand canDoAction failed because it can not SSH to the Host 4) The compensation mechanism performs a rollback operation , thus it calls the RemoveVdsCommand 5) We are getting the ERROR of "Cannot get vdsManager" during the RemoveVdsCommand Is the Bug only request that in t6he case that the Host failed to been added we will skip the "Cannot get vdsManager" logging error ??? Eli, correct. The idea is to to tightly watch logs for errors. So if it's not critical then don't show it. Otherwise customers may have false alarms thinking something is wrong when in reality it is not. Make sense? (In reply to Dave Sullivan from comment #2) > Eli, correct. > > The idea is to to tightly watch logs for errors. So if it's not critical > then don't show it. Otherwise customers may have false alarms thinking > something is wrong when in reality it is not. > > Make sense? Yes verified on rhevm-3.4.0-0.5.master.el6ev.noarch - Attempt to add host - put incorrect password - check in engine log for "Cannot get vdsManager" ... i found none. Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2014-0506.html *** Bug 1127345 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** |