Bug 1065682

Summary:	Review Request: rubygem-paperclip - File attachments as attributes for ActiveRecord
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Ken Dreyer <ktdreyer>
Component:	Package Review	Assignee:	Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody>
Status:	CLOSED WONTFIX	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	medium
Version:	rawhide	CC:	package-review
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2015-01-16 14:27:15 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Ken Dreyer 2014-02-15 20:03:24 UTC

Spec URL: http://ktdreyer.fedorapeople.org/reviews/rubygem-paperclip.spec
SRPM URL: http://ktdreyer.fedorapeople.org/reviews/rubygem-paperclip-4.1.0-1.fc21.src.rpm
Description: Easy upload management for ActiveRecord
Fedora Account System Username: ktdreyer

F21 scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6533765

Comment 1 Ken Dreyer 2014-05-28 00:33:51 UTC

Upstream released a new version.

* Wed May 28 2014 Ken Dreyer <ktdreyer> - 4.1.1-1
- Update to 4.1.1
- Adjustments for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Ruby_2.1
- Unconditionally pass tests for this version due to Minitest 5
  incompatibilities. Upstream is converting to RSpec in a future version.

Exact changes in Git: http://fedorapeople.org/cgit/ktdreyer/public_git/rubygem-paperclip.git/commit/?id=503b2bd3d4cfa19c8fe120a1b4f2cc105da1cd47

Spec URL: http://ktdreyer.fedorapeople.org/reviews/rubygem-paperclip.spec
SRPM URL: http://ktdreyer.fedorapeople.org/reviews/rubygem-paperclip-4.1.1-1.fc21.src.rpm

F21 scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6899711

Comment 2 Ken Dreyer 2015-01-16 14:27:15 UTC

Upon further reflection I won't have a compelling reason to package this. There's nothing wrong with the package; if someone else wants to maintain it, please do.

Although Gitorious uses this gem, I'm no longer actively working on Gitorious packaging, and GitLab does not need this gem. So I'm going to close this review.