Bug 1065682 - Review Request: rubygem-paperclip - File attachments as attributes for ActiveRecord
Summary: Review Request: rubygem-paperclip - File attachments as attributes for Active...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2014-02-15 20:03 UTC by Ken Dreyer
Modified: 2015-01-16 14:27 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2015-01-16 14:27:15 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Ken Dreyer 2014-02-15 20:03:24 UTC
Spec URL: http://ktdreyer.fedorapeople.org/reviews/rubygem-paperclip.spec
SRPM URL: http://ktdreyer.fedorapeople.org/reviews/rubygem-paperclip-4.1.0-1.fc21.src.rpm
Description: Easy upload management for ActiveRecord
Fedora Account System Username: ktdreyer

F21 scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6533765

Comment 1 Ken Dreyer 2014-05-28 00:33:51 UTC
Upstream released a new version.

* Wed May 28 2014 Ken Dreyer <ktdreyer> - 4.1.1-1
- Update to 4.1.1
- Adjustments for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Ruby_2.1
- Unconditionally pass tests for this version due to Minitest 5
  incompatibilities. Upstream is converting to RSpec in a future version.

Exact changes in Git: http://fedorapeople.org/cgit/ktdreyer/public_git/rubygem-paperclip.git/commit/?id=503b2bd3d4cfa19c8fe120a1b4f2cc105da1cd47

Spec URL: http://ktdreyer.fedorapeople.org/reviews/rubygem-paperclip.spec
SRPM URL: http://ktdreyer.fedorapeople.org/reviews/rubygem-paperclip-4.1.1-1.fc21.src.rpm

F21 scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6899711

Comment 2 Ken Dreyer 2015-01-16 14:27:15 UTC
Upon further reflection I won't have a compelling reason to package this. There's nothing wrong with the package; if someone else wants to maintain it, please do.

Although Gitorious uses this gem, I'm no longer actively working on Gitorious packaging, and GitLab does not need this gem. So I'm going to close this review.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.